-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
providesModule -> explicit requires for cross-package dependencies #9078
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM :)
Need to verify UMD builds still work correctly. |
@gaearon maybe wait till you come into the office, I'd like you to step me through that process to see if there's anything I missed? Thanks man. |
Yea that was my plan! |
@gaearon @sebmarkbage I've just tested the UMD bundles locally on your branch and they all look good to me! |
Files that require modules from a different package than their own now does so by the npm path name instead of the providesModule.
This is a bit lame but because of our module rewrite we need to white list all the paths that we don't *don't* want to rewrite.
5c21cb5
to
a58e8cb
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It feels weird to require react/lib/* from files that get packaged into react, but I suppose this makes sense.
This is one step closer to a CommonJS/Lerna set up.
I added some forwarding modules for Flow and Jest's sake. They have the same purpose as the symlinks Lerna or Yarn Workspaces would provide.
I ran a codemod to use explicit package paths for cross-package dependencies and unit tests.
The rest of the requires are still providesModule.