Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Pretrained model performance? #45

Closed
TheShadow29 opened this issue May 3, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Pretrained model performance? #45

TheShadow29 opened this issue May 3, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@TheShadow29
Copy link

Hi. Thanks for the resourceful repository.

I was wondering if you could share the pre-trained model performances for the validation and the test sets for the various datasets.
@apsdehal
Copy link
Contributor

apsdehal commented May 3, 2019

Hi,

Yes, we plan to add them to pretrained models section in documentation and Readme. Expect an update from me soon.

@apsdehal
Copy link
Contributor

Performance tables have been added to README and documentation. Please feel free to reopen if something is not clear. Thanks.

@ChenyuGAO-CS ChenyuGAO-CS mentioned this issue Jul 3, 2019
Closed
apsdehal added a commit that referenced this issue May 8, 2020
@apsdehal
[refactor] Move .yml to .yaml for standard recommendations (#45)
974ccc9 
YAML authors suggest .yaml as official extension so we should be using .yaml wherever possible.
apsdehal added a commit that referenced this issue May 8, 2020
@apsdehal
[refactor] Move .yml to .yaml for standard recommendations (#45)
0f24bc9 
YAML authors suggest .yaml as official extension so we should be using .yaml wherever possible.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@apsdehal @TheShadow29