Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use match? method #2063

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Use match? method #2063

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

koic
Copy link
Member

@koic koic commented Jun 18, 2020

Follow up #2038.

This PR uses match?. Since Ruby 2.4, match? method has been introduced.
If MatchData is not captured, it is faster to use match?.

@koic koic force-pushed the use_match_predicate branch from c8209b2 to 181a390 Compare June 19, 2020 21:25
Follow up faker-ruby#2038.

This PR uses `match?`. Since Ruby 2.4, `match?` method has been introduced.
If `MatchData` is not captured, it is faster to use `match?`.
@stefannibrasil
Copy link
Contributor

Hey there. In an effort to lighten our load as maintainers and be able to serve you better in the future, the faker-ruby team is working on cleaning out the cobwebs in this repo by pruning the backlog. As there are few of us, there are a lot of items that will simply never earn our attention in a reasonable time frame, and rather than giving you an empty promise, we think it makes more sense to focus on more recent issues. That means, unfortunately, that we must close this PR.

Don't take this the wrong way: our aim is not to diminish the effort people have made or dismiss problems that have been raised.

If you feel that we should reopen this PR, please do the following first:

  • rebase with master to fix any conflicts
  • verify this contribution is still relevant (i.e. hasn't been implemented/solved yet)
  • run tests again

Then please let us know so that we can re-prioritize it. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants