Add gcc-6 to Dockerfiles #372
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Merging for 0.5.0
Merging for 0.6.0
Merging for 0.7.0
…G_ORC_UNWINDER or CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION. (#362) sysdig-CLA-1.0-signed-off-by: David Archer <[email protected]>
|
I can confirm that it works. Without this patch, it fails with Debian Stretch as described in #371 (e.g. "k8s-1.9-debian-stretch-amd64-hvm-ebs-2018-03-11 AMI in EC2") |
* Add ability to skip rules for unknown filters Add the ability to skip a rule if its condition refers to a filtercheck that doesn't exist. This allows defining a rules file that contains new conditions that can still has limited backward compatibility with older falco versions. When compiling a filter, return a list of filtercheck names that are present in the ast (which also includes filterchecks from any macros). This set of filtercheck names is matched against the set of filterchecks known to sinsp, expressed as lua patterns, and in the global table defined_filters. If no match is found, the rule loader throws an error. The pattern changes slightly depending on whether the filter has arguments or not. Two filters (proc.apid/proc.aname) can work with or without arguments, so both styles of patterns are used. If the rule has an attribute "skip-if-unknown-filter", the rule will be skipped instead. * Unit tests for skipping unknown filter New unit test for skipping unknown filter. Test cases: - A rule that refers to an unknown filter results in an error. - A rule that refers to an unknown filter, but has "skip-if-unknown-filter: true", can be read, but doesn't match any events. - A rule that refers to an unknown filter, but has "skip-if-unknown-filter: false", returns an error. Also test the case of a filtercheck like evt.arg.xxx working properly with the embedded patterns as well as proc.aname/apid which work both ways.
…into mfdii/include_gcc-6
|
@mfdii Why did you close this? 🤔 |
|
I messed up the rebase, so it was easier to start over since it's a 3 line change |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
gcc-6 is needed to build the kernel module on some platforms (Debian Stretch). Fixes #371