Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Viceroy "inline-toml" format and new contents field. #567

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 27, 2022

Conversation

fgsch
Copy link
Member

@fgsch fgsch commented May 27, 2022

Make file optional as well. This is an interim solution while a
more robust one is investigated that is format aware, that's it,
so either file or contents are added even if empty, depending
on whether the format is json or inline-toml, respectively.

Make `file` optional as well.  This is an interim solution while a
more robust one is investigated that is `format` aware, that's it,
so either `file` or `contents` are added even if empty, depending
on whether the `format` is `json` or `inline-toml`, respectively.
@fgsch fgsch requested a review from Integralist May 27, 2022 09:05
@fgsch fgsch added the bug Something isn't working label May 27, 2022
@fgsch
Copy link
Member Author

fgsch commented May 27, 2022

Tests are missing. Happy to have a chat about a better solution.

@Integralist Integralist changed the title Understand inline-toml contents field Support Viceroy "inline-toml" format and new contents field. May 27, 2022
@Integralist Integralist added enhancement New feature or request and removed bug Something isn't working labels May 27, 2022
@Integralist Integralist merged commit f2d3284 into main May 27, 2022
@Integralist Integralist deleted the fgsch/workaround-inline-toml branch May 27, 2022 12:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants