-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 128
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
mTLS #440
mTLS #440
Conversation
61f1eb1
to
5107034
Compare
5107034
to
8a1cfd2
Compare
…d use slice for include property
Now that @joeshaw's other comments have been addressed I'm going to merge this PR later today. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
} | ||
|
||
// Create private key required to generate a custom certificate. | ||
var pk *PrivateKey |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think adding these in table-driven tests format would be concise and easily extendible. You can also add a cleanup func for each test case which you can run after executing the case to get rid of defer statements.
This is just a suggestion, and not a blocker to merge this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
No description provided.