Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove FeatureRow compaction in BQ sink #960

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 25, 2020

Conversation

pyalex
Copy link
Collaborator

@pyalex pyalex commented Aug 24, 2020

What this PR does / why we need it:
Currently we use compaction + sampling on the success output stream of BigQuery sink. Since we sampling anyway due to memory footprint concerns and the fact that this output is being used for metrics only - there's no need in compaction, which required significant CPU resources.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

BigQuery sink outputs sample of FeatureRows to `successfully written` stream

@pyalex pyalex changed the title Remove FeatureRow compaction and use Sampling instead Remove FeatureRow compaction in BQ sink Aug 24, 2020
@pyalex
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pyalex commented Aug 24, 2020

/retest

@woop
Copy link
Member

woop commented Aug 25, 2020

/lgtm

@woop
Copy link
Member

woop commented Aug 25, 2020

/lgtm

@feast-ci-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pyalex, woop

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@feast-ci-bot feast-ci-bot merged commit 896cb56 into feast-dev:master Aug 25, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants