Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Second day is always missed in logs - why? #16

Closed
vritme opened this issue Jan 29, 2021 · 10 comments
Closed

Second day is always missed in logs - why? #16

vritme opened this issue Jan 29, 2021 · 10 comments

Comments

@vritme
Copy link

vritme commented Jan 29, 2021

Is it just logging imperfection or second day of each month/year/any dataset is always missing in the resulting dataset? @ffeast
31-30-finam-export
31-30-finam-export-2

@vritme
Copy link
Author

vritme commented Jan 29, 2021

year

@vritme
Copy link
Author

vritme commented Jan 29, 2021

2020-366

@ffeast
Copy link
Owner

ffeast commented Jan 30, 2021

Hi
Need to look into it. Have you checked the actual data in the resulting files? Are any bars missing?

@vritme
Copy link
Author

vritme commented Jan 31, 2021

I see lot's of yearly downloaded files starting from 3-rd of January, but that's may be because of moex work time.

Also i've made some half of the years downloads like BR from 2019.07.01 to 2019.12.31 and in this case there IS 07.02 date, as well as 07.01 and 07.03. So it looks quite indefinite and confusing..

Still, if we look at logs, it tolds us, that query with day 2 is always missed for no reason. I think it should be more accurate in logging anyway..

@vritme
Copy link
Author

vritme commented Feb 3, 2021

So have you discovered something about it?
df2 is missed

@vritme
Copy link
Author

vritme commented Feb 4, 2021

Did some more research.
The app in fact missed second day of requested period, which in reality has quotes.
So you can see it on February, but on the next month, March, second day was downloaded successfully. So it looks like unstable behaviour around 2-nd day of period.
Maybe it's only with ticks, but looks like it's some general bug.
day_2_is_missed_ticks
day_2_is_ok_ticks
2016-02-02-ok

@vritme
Copy link
Author

vritme commented Feb 4, 2021

I checked all months of 2016 with working days on 2-nd day of month. Only February has problem, but still, very inconvenient to checks manually gigabytes of txt's...

@ffeast
Copy link
Owner

ffeast commented Feb 6, 2021

Confirm, there's a bug. Thanks for you report. The cause is slightly different from what you described but it still needs to be fixed

@ffeast
Copy link
Owner

ffeast commented Feb 6, 2021

Should be fixed in 4.0.2

@ffeast
Copy link
Owner

ffeast commented Nov 4, 2021

Solved long ago, closing

@ffeast ffeast closed this as completed Nov 4, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants