[Clang] Add -fwrapv-pointer flag (llvm#122486)

GCC supports three flags related to overflow behavior:
 * `-fwrapv`: Makes signed integer overflow well-defined.
 * `-fwrapv-pointer`: Makes pointer overflow well-defined.
* `-fno-strict-overflow`: Implies `-fwrapv -fwrapv-pointer`, making both
signed integer overflow and pointer overflow well-defined.

Clang currently only supports `-fno-strict-overflow` and `-fwrapv`, but
not `-fwrapv-pointer`.

This PR proposes to introduce `-fwrapv-pointer` and adjust the semantics
of `-fwrapv` to match GCC.

This allows signed integer overflow and pointer overflow to be
controlled independently, while `-fno-strict-overflow` still exists to
control both at the same time (and that option is consistent across GCC
and Clang).

clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst

@@ -79,7 +79,15 @@ code bases.
   Undefined behavior due to pointer addition overflow can be reliably detected
   using ``-fsanitize=pointer-overflow``. It is also possible to use
   ``-fno-strict-overflow`` to opt-in to a language dialect where signed integer
-  and pointer overflow are well-defined.
+  and pointer overflow are well-defined. Since Clang 20, it is also possible
+  to use ``-fwrapv-pointer`` to only make pointer overflow well-defined, while
+  not affecting the behavior of signed integer overflow.
+
+- The ``-fwrapv`` flag now only makes signed integer overflow well-defined,
+  without affecting pointer overflow, which is controlled by a new
+  ``-fwrapv-pointer`` flag. The ``-fno-strict-overflow`` flag now implies
+  both ``-fwrapv`` and ``-fwrapv-pointer`` and as such retains its old meaning.
+  The new behavior matches GCC.
 
 C/C++ Language Potentially Breaking Changes
 -------------------------------------------
@@ -521,6 +529,11 @@ New Compiler Flags
 - clang-cl and clang-dxc now support ``-fdiagnostics-color=[auto|never|always]``
   in addition to ``-f[no-]color-diagnostics``.
 
+- The new ``-fwrapv-pointer`` flag opts-in to a language dialect where pointer
+  overflow is well-defined. The ``-fwrapv`` flag previously implied
+  ``-fwrapv-pointer`` as well, but no longer does. ``-fno-strict-overflow``
+  implies ``-fwrapv -fwrapv-pointer``. The flags now match GCC.
+
 Deprecated Compiler Flags
 -------------------------
 

clang/include/clang/Basic/LangOptions.def

@@ -407,6 +407,7 @@ VALUE_LANGOPT(TrivialAutoVarInitMaxSize, 32, 0,
              "stop trivial automatic variable initialization if var size exceeds the specified size (in bytes). Must be greater than 0.")
 ENUM_LANGOPT(SignedOverflowBehavior, SignedOverflowBehaviorTy, 2, SOB_Undefined,
              "signed integer overflow handling")
+LANGOPT(PointerOverflowDefined, 1, 0, "make pointer overflow defined")
 ENUM_LANGOPT(ThreadModel  , ThreadModelKind, 2, ThreadModelKind::POSIX, "Thread Model")
 
 BENIGN_LANGOPT(ArrowDepth, 32, 256,

clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td

@@ -4301,6 +4301,11 @@ def fwrapv : Flag<["-"], "fwrapv">, Group<f_Group>,
   HelpText<"Treat signed integer overflow as two's complement">;
 def fno_wrapv : Flag<["-"], "fno-wrapv">, Group<f_Group>,
   Visibility<[ClangOption, CLOption, FlangOption]>;
+def fwrapv_pointer : Flag<["-"], "fwrapv-pointer">, Group<f_Group>,
+  Visibility<[ClangOption, CLOption, CC1Option, FlangOption, FC1Option]>,
+  HelpText<"Treat pointer overflow as two's complement">;
+def fno_wrapv_pointer : Flag<["-"], "fno-wrapv-pointer">, Group<f_Group>,
+  Visibility<[ClangOption, CLOption, FlangOption]>;
 def fwritable_strings : Flag<["-"], "fwritable-strings">, Group<f_Group>,
   Visibility<[ClangOption, CC1Option]>,
   HelpText<"Store string literals as writable data">,

clang/lib/CodeGen/CGBuiltin.cpp

@@ -22284,7 +22284,7 @@ RValue CodeGenFunction::EmitBuiltinAlignTo(const CallExpr *E, bool AlignUp) {
     // By adding the mask, we ensure that align_up on an already aligned
     // value will not change the value.
     if (Args.Src->getType()->isPointerTy()) {
-      if (getLangOpts().isSignedOverflowDefined())
+      if (getLangOpts().PointerOverflowDefined)
         SrcForMask =
             Builder.CreateGEP(Int8Ty, SrcForMask, Args.Mask, "over_boundary");
       else

clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp

@@ -4318,14 +4318,14 @@ LValue CodeGenFunction::EmitArraySubscriptExpr(const ArraySubscriptExpr *E,
     // GEP indexes are signed, and scaling an index isn't permitted to
     // signed-overflow, so we use the same semantics for our explicit
     // multiply.  We suppress this if overflow is not undefined behavior.
-    if (getLangOpts().isSignedOverflowDefined()) {
+    if (getLangOpts().PointerOverflowDefined) {
       Idx = Builder.CreateMul(Idx, numElements);
     } else {
       Idx = Builder.CreateNSWMul(Idx, numElements);
     }
 
     Addr = emitArraySubscriptGEP(*this, Addr, Idx, vla->getElementType(),
-                                 !getLangOpts().isSignedOverflowDefined(),
+                                 !getLangOpts().PointerOverflowDefined,
                                  SignedIndices, E->getExprLoc());
 
   } else if (const ObjCObjectType *OIT = E->getType()->getAs<ObjCObjectType>()){
@@ -4415,7 +4415,7 @@ LValue CodeGenFunction::EmitArraySubscriptExpr(const ArraySubscriptExpr *E,
     QualType arrayType = Array->getType();
     Addr = emitArraySubscriptGEP(
         *this, ArrayLV.getAddress(), {CGM.getSize(CharUnits::Zero()), Idx},
-        E->getType(), !getLangOpts().isSignedOverflowDefined(), SignedIndices,
+        E->getType(), !getLangOpts().PointerOverflowDefined, SignedIndices,
         E->getExprLoc(), &arrayType, E->getBase());
     EltBaseInfo = ArrayLV.getBaseInfo();
     EltTBAAInfo = CGM.getTBAAInfoForSubobject(ArrayLV, E->getType());
@@ -4424,10 +4424,9 @@ LValue CodeGenFunction::EmitArraySubscriptExpr(const ArraySubscriptExpr *E,
     Addr = EmitPointerWithAlignment(E->getBase(), &EltBaseInfo, &EltTBAAInfo);
     auto *Idx = EmitIdxAfterBase(/*Promote*/true);
     QualType ptrType = E->getBase()->getType();
-    Addr = emitArraySubscriptGEP(*this, Addr, Idx, E->getType(),
-                                 !getLangOpts().isSignedOverflowDefined(),
-                                 SignedIndices, E->getExprLoc(), &ptrType,
-                                 E->getBase());
+    Addr = emitArraySubscriptGEP(
+        *this, Addr, Idx, E->getType(), !getLangOpts().PointerOverflowDefined,
+        SignedIndices, E->getExprLoc(), &ptrType, E->getBase());
   }
 
   LValue LV = MakeAddrLValue(Addr, E->getType(), EltBaseInfo, EltTBAAInfo);
@@ -4572,11 +4571,11 @@ LValue CodeGenFunction::EmitArraySectionExpr(const ArraySectionExpr *E,
                 : llvm::ConstantInt::get(IntPtrTy, ConstLength);
         Idx = Builder.CreateAdd(LowerBoundVal, LengthVal, "lb_add_len",
                                 /*HasNUW=*/false,
-                                !getLangOpts().isSignedOverflowDefined());
+                                !getLangOpts().PointerOverflowDefined);
         if (Length && LowerBound) {
           Idx = Builder.CreateSub(
               Idx, llvm::ConstantInt::get(IntPtrTy, /*V=*/1), "idx_sub_1",
-              /*HasNUW=*/false, !getLangOpts().isSignedOverflowDefined());
+              /*HasNUW=*/false, !getLangOpts().PointerOverflowDefined);
         }
       } else
         Idx = llvm::ConstantInt::get(IntPtrTy, ConstLength + ConstLowerBound);
@@ -4602,7 +4601,7 @@ LValue CodeGenFunction::EmitArraySectionExpr(const ArraySectionExpr *E,
             Length->getType()->hasSignedIntegerRepresentation());
         Idx = Builder.CreateSub(
             LengthVal, llvm::ConstantInt::get(IntPtrTy, /*V=*/1), "len_sub_1",
-            /*HasNUW=*/false, !getLangOpts().isSignedOverflowDefined());
+            /*HasNUW=*/false, !getLangOpts().PointerOverflowDefined);
       } else {
         ConstLength = ConstLength.zextOrTrunc(PointerWidthInBits);
         --ConstLength;
@@ -4629,12 +4628,12 @@ LValue CodeGenFunction::EmitArraySectionExpr(const ArraySectionExpr *E,
     // GEP indexes are signed, and scaling an index isn't permitted to
     // signed-overflow, so we use the same semantics for our explicit
     // multiply.  We suppress this if overflow is not undefined behavior.
-    if (getLangOpts().isSignedOverflowDefined())
+    if (getLangOpts().PointerOverflowDefined)
       Idx = Builder.CreateMul(Idx, NumElements);
     else
       Idx = Builder.CreateNSWMul(Idx, NumElements);
     EltPtr = emitArraySubscriptGEP(*this, Base, Idx, VLA->getElementType(),
-                                   !getLangOpts().isSignedOverflowDefined(),
+                                   !getLangOpts().PointerOverflowDefined,
                                    /*signedIndices=*/false, E->getExprLoc());
   } else if (const Expr *Array = isSimpleArrayDecayOperand(E->getBase())) {
     // If this is A[i] where A is an array, the frontend will have decayed the
@@ -4654,7 +4653,7 @@ LValue CodeGenFunction::EmitArraySectionExpr(const ArraySectionExpr *E,
     // Propagate the alignment from the array itself to the result.
     EltPtr = emitArraySubscriptGEP(
         *this, ArrayLV.getAddress(), {CGM.getSize(CharUnits::Zero()), Idx},
-        ResultExprTy, !getLangOpts().isSignedOverflowDefined(),
+        ResultExprTy, !getLangOpts().PointerOverflowDefined,
         /*signedIndices=*/false, E->getExprLoc());
     BaseInfo = ArrayLV.getBaseInfo();
     TBAAInfo = CGM.getTBAAInfoForSubobject(ArrayLV, ResultExprTy);
@@ -4663,7 +4662,7 @@ LValue CodeGenFunction::EmitArraySectionExpr(const ArraySectionExpr *E,
         emitOMPArraySectionBase(*this, E->getBase(), BaseInfo, TBAAInfo, BaseTy,
                                 ResultExprTy, IsLowerBound);
     EltPtr = emitArraySubscriptGEP(*this, Base, Idx, ResultExprTy,
-                                   !getLangOpts().isSignedOverflowDefined(),
+                                   !getLangOpts().PointerOverflowDefined,
                                    /*signedIndices=*/false, E->getExprLoc());
   }
 

clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp

@@ -3043,7 +3043,7 @@ ScalarExprEmitter::EmitScalarPrePostIncDec(const UnaryOperator *E, LValue LV,
       llvm::Value *numElts = CGF.getVLASize(vla).NumElts;
       if (!isInc) numElts = Builder.CreateNSWNeg(numElts, "vla.negsize");
       llvm::Type *elemTy = CGF.ConvertTypeForMem(vla->getElementType());
-      if (CGF.getLangOpts().isSignedOverflowDefined())
+      if (CGF.getLangOpts().PointerOverflowDefined)
         value = Builder.CreateGEP(elemTy, value, numElts, "vla.inc");
       else
         value = CGF.EmitCheckedInBoundsGEP(
@@ -3054,7 +3054,7 @@ ScalarExprEmitter::EmitScalarPrePostIncDec(const UnaryOperator *E, LValue LV,
     } else if (type->isFunctionType()) {
       llvm::Value *amt = Builder.getInt32(amount);
 
-      if (CGF.getLangOpts().isSignedOverflowDefined())
+      if (CGF.getLangOpts().PointerOverflowDefined)
         value = Builder.CreateGEP(CGF.Int8Ty, value, amt, "incdec.funcptr");
       else
         value =
@@ -3066,7 +3066,7 @@ ScalarExprEmitter::EmitScalarPrePostIncDec(const UnaryOperator *E, LValue LV,
     } else {
       llvm::Value *amt = Builder.getInt32(amount);
       llvm::Type *elemTy = CGF.ConvertTypeForMem(type);
-      if (CGF.getLangOpts().isSignedOverflowDefined())
+      if (CGF.getLangOpts().PointerOverflowDefined)
         value = Builder.CreateGEP(elemTy, value, amt, "incdec.ptr");
       else
         value = CGF.EmitCheckedInBoundsGEP(
@@ -3179,7 +3179,7 @@ ScalarExprEmitter::EmitScalarPrePostIncDec(const UnaryOperator *E, LValue LV,
     llvm::Value *sizeValue =
       llvm::ConstantInt::get(CGF.SizeTy, size.getQuantity());
 
-    if (CGF.getLangOpts().isSignedOverflowDefined())
+    if (CGF.getLangOpts().PointerOverflowDefined)
       value = Builder.CreateGEP(CGF.Int8Ty, value, sizeValue, "incdec.objptr");
     else
       value = CGF.EmitCheckedInBoundsGEP(
@@ -4075,7 +4075,7 @@ static Value *emitPointerArithmetic(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
     // signed-overflow, so we use the same semantics for our explicit
     // multiply.  We suppress this if overflow is not undefined behavior.
     llvm::Type *elemTy = CGF.ConvertTypeForMem(vla->getElementType());
-    if (CGF.getLangOpts().isSignedOverflowDefined()) {
+    if (CGF.getLangOpts().PointerOverflowDefined) {
       index = CGF.Builder.CreateMul(index, numElements, "vla.index");
       pointer = CGF.Builder.CreateGEP(elemTy, pointer, index, "add.ptr");
     } else {
@@ -4096,7 +4096,7 @@ static Value *emitPointerArithmetic(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
   else
     elemTy = CGF.ConvertTypeForMem(elementType);
 
-  if (CGF.getLangOpts().isSignedOverflowDefined())
+  if (CGF.getLangOpts().PointerOverflowDefined)
     return CGF.Builder.CreateGEP(elemTy, pointer, index, "add.ptr");
 
   return CGF.EmitCheckedInBoundsGEP(

clang/lib/Driver/SanitizerArgs.cpp

@@ -575,6 +575,9 @@ SanitizerArgs::SanitizerArgs(const ToolChain &TC,
                                      options::OPT_fstrict_overflow, false);
         if (Args.hasFlagNoClaim(options::OPT_fwrapv, options::OPT_fno_wrapv, S))
           Add &= ~SanitizerKind::SignedIntegerOverflow;
+        if (Args.hasFlagNoClaim(options::OPT_fwrapv_pointer,
+                                options::OPT_fno_wrapv_pointer, S))
+          Add &= ~SanitizerKind::PointerOverflow;
       }
       Add &= Supported;
 

clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/CommonArgs.cpp

@@ -3095,12 +3095,19 @@ void tools::renderCommonIntegerOverflowOptions(const ArgList &Args,
                                                ArgStringList &CmdArgs) {
   // -fno-strict-overflow implies -fwrapv if it isn't disabled, but
   // -fstrict-overflow won't turn off an explicitly enabled -fwrapv.
+  bool StrictOverflow = Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_fstrict_overflow,
+                                     options::OPT_fno_strict_overflow, true);
   if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_fwrapv, options::OPT_fno_wrapv)) {
     if (A->getOption().matches(options::OPT_fwrapv))
       CmdArgs.push_back("-fwrapv");
-  } else if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_fstrict_overflow,
-                                      options::OPT_fno_strict_overflow)) {
-    if (A->getOption().matches(options::OPT_fno_strict_overflow))
-      CmdArgs.push_back("-fwrapv");
+  } else if (!StrictOverflow) {
+    CmdArgs.push_back("-fwrapv");
+  }
+  if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_fwrapv_pointer,
+                               options::OPT_fno_wrapv_pointer)) {
+    if (A->getOption().matches(options::OPT_fwrapv_pointer))
+      CmdArgs.push_back("-fwrapv-pointer");
+  } else if (!StrictOverflow) {
+    CmdArgs.push_back("-fwrapv-pointer");
   }
 }

clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp

@@ -3721,6 +3721,8 @@ void CompilerInvocationBase::GenerateLangArgs(const LangOptions &Opts,
   } else if (Opts.SignedOverflowBehavior == LangOptions::SOB_Defined) {
     GenerateArg(Consumer, OPT_fwrapv);
   }
+  if (Opts.PointerOverflowDefined)
+    GenerateArg(Consumer, OPT_fwrapv_pointer);
 
   if (Opts.MSCompatibilityVersion != 0) {
     unsigned Major = Opts.MSCompatibilityVersion / 10000000;
@@ -4138,6 +4140,8 @@ bool CompilerInvocation::ParseLangArgs(LangOptions &Opts, ArgList &Args,
   }
   else if (Args.hasArg(OPT_fwrapv))
     Opts.setSignedOverflowBehavior(LangOptions::SOB_Defined);
+  if (Args.hasArg(OPT_fwrapv_pointer))
+    Opts.PointerOverflowDefined = true;
 
   Opts.MSCompatibilityVersion = 0;
   if (const Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(OPT_fms_compatibility_version)) {

clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp

@@ -11798,7 +11798,7 @@ static std::optional<bool> isTautologicalBoundsCheck(Sema &S, const Expr *LHS,
                                                      const Expr *RHS,
                                                      BinaryOperatorKind Opc) {
   if (!LHS->getType()->isPointerType() ||
-      S.getLangOpts().isSignedOverflowDefined())
+      S.getLangOpts().PointerOverflowDefined)
     return std::nullopt;
 
   // Canonicalize to >= or < predicate.

clang/test/CodeGen/integer-overflow.c

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DEFAULT
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin %s -emit-llvm -o - -fwrapv | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=WRAPV
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin %s -emit-llvm -o - -ftrapv | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=TRAPV
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin %s -emit-llvm -o - -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CATCH_UB,CATCH_UB_POINTER
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin %s -emit-llvm -o - -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CATCH_UB,NOCATCH_UB_POINTER
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin %s -emit-llvm -o - -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow -fwrapv | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CATCH_UB,NOCATCH_UB_POINTER
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin %s -emit-llvm -o - -ftrapv -ftrapv-handler foo | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=TRAPV_HANDLER
 
@@ -57,14 +57,14 @@ void test1(void) {
   // TRAPV_HANDLER: foo(
   --a;
 
-  // -fwrapv should turn off inbounds for GEP's, PR9256
+  // -fwrapv does not affect inbounds for GEP's.
+  // This is controlled by -fwrapv-pointer instead.
   extern int* P;
   ++P;
   // DEFAULT: getelementptr inbounds nuw i32, ptr
-  // WRAPV: getelementptr i32, ptr
+  // WRAPV: getelementptr inbounds nuw i32, ptr
   // TRAPV: getelementptr inbounds nuw i32, ptr
-  // CATCH_UB_POINTER: getelementptr inbounds nuw i32, ptr
-  // NOCATCH_UB_POINTER: getelementptr i32, ptr
+  // NOCATCH_UB_POINTER: getelementptr inbounds nuw i32, ptr
 
   // PR9350: char pre-increment never overflows.
   extern volatile signed char PR9350_char_inc;

clang/test/CodeGen/pointer-overflow.c

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DEFAULT
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin %s -emit-llvm -o - -fwrapv | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DEFAULT
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin %s -emit-llvm -o - -ftrapv | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DEFAULT
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin %s -emit-llvm -o - -fwrapv-pointer | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=FWRAPV-POINTER
+
+void test(void) {
+  // -fwrapv-pointer should turn off inbounds for GEP's
+  extern int* P;
+  ++P;
+  // DEFAULT: getelementptr inbounds nuw i32, ptr
+  // FWRAPV-POINTER: getelementptr i32, ptr
+}

clang/test/Driver/clang_wrapv_opts.c

@@ -1,11 +1,20 @@
-// RUN: %clang -### -S -fwrapv -fno-wrapv -fwrapv %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK1 %s
-// CHECK1: -fwrapv
+// RUN: %clang -### -S -fwrapv -fno-wrapv -fwrapv -Werror %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK1 %s
+// CHECK1: "-fwrapv"
 //
-// RUN: %clang -### -S -fstrict-overflow -fno-strict-overflow %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK2 %s
-// CHECK2: -fwrapv
+// RUN: %clang -### -S -fwrapv-pointer -fno-wrapv-pointer -fwrapv-pointer -Werror %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK1-POINTER %s
+// CHECK1-POINTER: "-fwrapv-pointer"
 //
-// RUN: %clang -### -S -fwrapv -fstrict-overflow %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK3 %s
-// CHECK3: -fwrapv
+// RUN: %clang -### -S -fstrict-overflow -fno-strict-overflow -Werror %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK2 %s
+// CHECK2: "-fwrapv"{{.*}}"-fwrapv-pointer"
 //
-// RUN: %clang -### -S -fno-wrapv -fno-strict-overflow %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK4 %s
-// CHECK4-NOT: -fwrapv
+// RUN: %clang -### -S -fwrapv -fstrict-overflow -Werror -Werror %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK3 %s --implicit-check-not="-fwrapv-pointer"
+// CHECK3: "-fwrapv"
+//
+// RUN: %clang -### -S -fwrapv-pointer -fstrict-overflow -Werror %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK3-POINTER %s --implicit-check-not="-fwrapv"
+// CHECK3-POINTER: "-fwrapv-pointer"
+//
+// RUN: %clang -### -S -fno-wrapv -fno-strict-overflow -Werror %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK4 %s --implicit-check-not="-fwrapv"
+// CHECK4: "-fwrapv-pointer"
+//
+// RUN: %clang -### -S -fno-wrapv-pointer -fno-strict-overflow -Werror %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK4-POINTER %s --implicit-check-not="-fwrapv-pointer"
+// CHECK4-POINTER: "-fwrapv"

clang/test/Sema/tautological-pointer-comparison.c

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fwrapv -verify=fwrapv %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fwrapv-pointer -verify=fwrapv %s
 
 // fwrapv-no-diagnostics