Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

take advantage of FIPA compliant agents and C-mobile? #177

Open
eduarddrenth opened this issue Feb 24, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

take advantage of FIPA compliant agents and C-mobile? #177

eduarddrenth opened this issue Feb 24, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@eduarddrenth
Copy link

Sorry if come barging in. But having experienced the robustness and quality of FIPA-Jade I feel I have to point out this project could take advantage of standardized agent technology using Jade and perhaps also C-mobile. Jade has a very active community, mostly scientific environments, has some very large implementations in which it has proven its stability, speed and relevance. For example failover for all components that form the platform (main-container, container, agent), dealing with network outage, remotely synchronizing state, ready to use conversation protocols as statemachines, security, speed, tunneling through proxies and firewalls, ontologies, management GUI, debugging and testing have all been implemented. If you are interested in this I can give demos, presentations and I can also connect to the main developers in italy.

Hope to here from you, good luck with this very interesting project!

Eduard

@alex254
Copy link
Member

alex254 commented Feb 26, 2015

Dear Eduard,

Thanks again for pointing this out to us; I haven't looked into it yet but I will. I will try to read up on it next week and come back to you.

Kind regards,

Alexander

@alex254
Copy link
Member

alex254 commented Mar 6, 2015

Hi Eduard,

Ik looked into it! Very interesting indeed; from what I can tell it is a very generic Agent framework with a lot more communication possibilities such as query, inform etc. Conceptually it is very similar with platform, container etc. However, the Agents in the PowerMatcher only need to inform each other so I don't see any added value there.

A lot of work has been done on implementing for instance security and the other features you've mentioned...some of these are items are next on our agenda. I would be happy if you talked us through some of the aspects with demos. Perhaps we can learn from them or even borrow code (if that's allowed?) I would like to investigate the possibilities of a cooperation although I dont suspect that we would switch to a new core. My email is [email protected]

Kind regards,

Alexander

@eduarddrenth
Copy link
Author

Jade is LGPL licensed, I don't know the exact details of what you can and
cannot do with the software.

Let's see if we can come together for demo's and more some time, see also
github.com/eduarddrenth/agent-technology

And yes perhaps we can organize a form of collaboration

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Alexander Krstulovic <
[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Eduard,

Ik looked into it! Very interesting indeed; from what I can tell it is a
very generic Agent framework with a lot more communication possibilities
such as query, inform etc. Conceptually it is very similar with platform,
container etc. However, the Agents in the PowerMatcher only need to inform
each other so I don't see any added value there.

A lot of work has been done on implementing for instance security and the
other features you've mentioned...some of these are items are next on our
agenda. I would be happy if you talked us through some of the aspects with
demos. Perhaps we can learn from them or even borrow code (if that's
allowed?) I would like to investigate the possibilities of a cooperation
although I dont suspect that we would switch to a new core. My email is
[email protected]

Kind regards,

Alexander


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#177 (comment)
.

@alex254
Copy link
Member

alex254 commented Mar 19, 2015

Hi Eduard,

Could you send me an email>? I dont have your details. Its [email protected].

Tx, Alex

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants