Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for policy alerts #3168

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jan 29, 2024
Merged

Add support for policy alerts #3168

merged 11 commits into from
Jan 29, 2024

Conversation

hasit
Copy link
Contributor

@hasit hasit commented Jan 26, 2024

Description of change

Checklist
  • Tested in playground or other setup
  • Screenshot (Grafana) from playground added to PR for 15+ minute run
  • Documentation is changed or added
  • Tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • Breaking changes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a system for managing the status of labels, enhancing the application's ability to track and update label statuses dynamically.
  • Refactor
    • Updated method calls across various components to support additional arguments, improving control flow and logic consistency.
    • Simplified the DynamicConfigUpdate method for more efficient configuration updates.
  • Chores
    • Added new dependencies and fields related to label status tracking, facilitating the integration of the new label management functionality.

hasit added 4 commits January 23, 2024 15:35
- SetStatus now accepts labels that go along with the alert. Amongst the labels, a special label called "severity" controls the severity of the alert
- concurrency-scheduler
- load-scheduler
- quota-scheduler
- scheduler
@hasit hasit self-assigned this Jan 26, 2024
@hasit hasit requested review from a team as code owners January 26, 2024 23:54
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates primarily focus on enhancing the status tracking system across various components of the project. A notable change is the introduction of an additional argument in SetStatus method calls to refine status management. The jobExecutor logic has been adjusted accordingly. Furthermore, a new labelstatus module is integrated to manage label statuses, affecting the flow control and autoscaling policies. This comprehensive change aims to improve the reliability and observability of the system's components.

Changes

Files Change Summary
pkg/jobs/job-tracker.go, pkg/notifiers/..., pkg/otelcollector/..., pkg/platform/..., pkg/policies/controlplane/..., pkg/status/..., pkg/watchdog/watchdog.go, test/aperture_suite_test.go Updated SetStatus calls to include a nil argument.
pkg/jobs/job.go Modified doJob in jobExecutor to include an additional argument in SetStatus, altering control flow and logic.
pkg/policies/autoscale/kubernetes/actuators/podscaler/pod-scaler.go Added an argument to SetStatus in newPodScalerOptions and setup.
pkg/policies/controlplane/components/alerter.go Simplified DynamicConfigUpdate to a single line.
pkg/policies/flowcontrol/..., pkg/policies/flowcontrol/provide.go Added imports, fields, methods for label status tracking, and integrated labelstatus module as a dependency.
pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go Introduced LabelStatusFactory for label status management, including lifecycle hooks and status updates.

🐰✨
In the garden of code, where changes bloom,
We've tended the status, with a new room.
Labels now whisper, with a status so bright,
Under the moon, our code dances at night.
🌟🌿


Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 6

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3834d85 and 2828179.
Files selected for processing (23)
  • pkg/jobs/job-tracker.go (1 hunks)
  • pkg/jobs/job.go (2 hunks)
  • pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go (1 hunks)
  • pkg/notifiers/fx-driver.go (3 hunks)
  • pkg/otelcollector/otelcollector.go (1 hunks)
  • pkg/platform/platform.go (1 hunks)
  • pkg/platform/readiness.go (1 hunks)
  • pkg/policies/autoscale/kubernetes/actuators/podscaler/pod-scaler.go (2 hunks)
  • pkg/policies/controlplane/components/alerter.go (1 hunks)
  • pkg/policies/controlplane/policy-factory.go (2 hunks)
  • pkg/policies/controlplane/runtime/circuit.go (1 hunks)
  • pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/concurrency-limiter/concurrency-limiter.go (14 hunks)
  • pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/concurrency-scheduler/concurrency-scheduler.go (14 hunks)
  • pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/load-scheduler/load-scheduler.go (14 hunks)
  • pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/quota-scheduler/quota-scheduler.go (12 hunks)
  • pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/rate-limiter/rate-limiter.go (13 hunks)
  • pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/sampler/sampler.go (2 hunks)
  • pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/workload-scheduler/scheduler.go (6 hunks)
  • pkg/policies/flowcontrol/resources/fluxmeter/flux-meter.go (1 hunks)
  • pkg/status/registry.go (2 hunks)
  • pkg/status/status_test.go (4 hunks)
  • pkg/watchdog/watchdog.go (1 hunks)
  • test/aperture_suite_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • pkg/platform/readiness.go
  • pkg/policies/controlplane/components/alerter.go
Additional comments: 68
pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go (7)
  • 18-21: The LabelStatusFactory struct is well-defined with a clear purpose. It holds a reference to a status.Registry, which is essential for creating LabelStatus instances with specific status management capabilities.
  • 23-28: The LabelStatusModule function correctly provides an fx.Option for dependency injection, ensuring that the LabelStatusFactory can be easily integrated into an application using the fx framework.
  • 30-34: The NewLabelStatusFactory function is correctly implemented to create and return a new instance of LabelStatusFactory. It properly initializes the registry field with a child registry specific to label status management.
  • 37-46: The New method in LabelStatusFactory correctly creates a new LabelStatus instance with the provided label key, policy name, and component ID. It ensures that each LabelStatus has its own registry for status management.
  • 48-56: The LabelStatus struct is well-defined, encapsulating the necessary fields for managing the status of labels. It includes synchronization primitives for thread safety, which is a good practice.
  • 58-79: The Setup method in LabelStatus correctly sets up lifecycle hooks for the label status, registering jobs for setting lookup status. It properly handles job registration and deregistration in the OnStart and OnStop hooks, respectively.
  • 81-86: The SetMissing method in LabelStatus correctly sets the status to missing with the current timestamp. It properly uses a lock to ensure thread safety when updating the timestamp.
pkg/jobs/job-tracker.go (1)
  • 72-72: The modification to the updateStatus method to include an additional nil argument in the SetStatus call aligns with the updated method signature. This change is consistent and correctly implemented.
pkg/platform/platform.go (2)
  • 167-167: The addition of an extra nil argument in the SetStatus method call within the Run function is correctly implemented, matching the updated method signature.
  • 172-172: The modification to include an additional nil argument in the SetStatus call during the platform stopping phase is correctly implemented and aligns with the updated method signature.
pkg/jobs/job.go (2)
  • 137-137: The addition of an extra nil argument in the SetStatus method call within the doJob method is correctly implemented, matching the updated method signature.
  • 141-141: The modification to include an additional nil argument in the SetStatus call after job completion is correctly implemented and aligns with the updated method signature.
pkg/otelcollector/otelcollector.go (1)
  • 166-166: The modification to include an additional nil argument in the SetStatus call within the setReadinessStatus function is correctly implemented, aligning with the updated method signature.
pkg/status/status_test.go (2)
  • 38-38: The test cases have been updated to include an additional nil argument in the SetStatus calls, reflecting the changes in the method signature. This ensures that the tests remain valid and accurate.
  • 101-101: The test cases correctly include an additional nil argument in the SetStatus calls, ensuring that the tests are aligned with the updated method signature.
pkg/notifiers/fx-driver.go (8)
  • 63-63: The addition of an extra nil argument in the SetStatus method call within the initApp function is correctly implemented, matching the updated method signature.
  • 101-101: The modification to include an additional nil argument in the SetStatus call when handling errors during app initialization is correctly implemented and aligns with the updated method signature.
  • 108-108: The addition of an extra nil argument in the SetStatus method call within the initApp function, indicating the start of the policy runner, is correctly implemented.
  • 114-114: The modification to include an additional nil argument in the SetStatus call when handling errors during app start is correctly implemented and aligns with the updated method signature.
  • 120-120: The addition of an extra nil argument in the SetStatus method call within the initApp function, indicating the successful start of the policy runner, is correctly implemented.
  • 122-122: The inclusion of an additional nil argument in the SetStatus call when the fxRunner is not initialized is correctly implemented, aligning with the updated method signature.
  • 128-128: The addition of an extra nil argument in the SetStatus method call within the deinitApp function, indicating the stopping of the policy runner, is correctly implemented.
  • 141-141: The modification to include an additional nil argument in the SetStatus call when the policy runner has stopped is correctly implemented and aligns with the updated method signature.
pkg/status/registry.go (3)
  • 18-18: The update to the SetStatus method signature to include an additional map[string]string parameter for labels is a significant change. This allows for more detailed status updates with contextual information.
  • 180-180: The implementation of the updated SetStatus method correctly handles the new labels parameter, ensuring that status updates can include additional contextual information.
  • 190-216: The createAlert method has been updated to accept and process an additional labels parameter. This enhancement allows for more detailed alerts with contextual information. The method correctly handles the severity label and removes it from the labels map before passing it to the alert options, ensuring that the severity is processed separately from other labels.
pkg/policies/controlplane/policy-factory.go (2)
  • 149-149: The addition of a nil argument to the SetStatus method call aligns with the updated method signature. Ensure that the nil argument's purpose (likely representing additional context or labels) is correctly handled or documented if it's intended for future use.
  • 159-159: Similar to the previous comment, the inclusion of a nil argument in the SetStatus method call is consistent with the method's new signature. It's important to verify that this change is properly documented, especially regarding the nil argument's intended use.
test/aperture_suite_test.go (2)
  • 199-199: The addition of a nil argument to the SetStatus method call is consistent with the updated method signature. This change should be documented, particularly the rationale behind the nil argument and how it might be utilized in the future.
  • 209-209: As with the previous instances, adding a nil argument to the SetStatus method call aligns with the updated method signature. Ensure this change is well-documented, focusing on the nil argument's intended purpose.
pkg/policies/flowcontrol/resources/fluxmeter/flux-meter.go (1)
  • 123-123: The inclusion of a nil argument in the SetStatus method call adheres to the updated method signature. It's crucial to document this change, especially the nil argument's role and potential future applications.
pkg/watchdog/watchdog.go (1)
  • 178-178: Adding a nil argument to the SetStatus method call is in line with the method's new signature. This modification should be documented, with a particular focus on explaining the nil argument's intended use.
pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/sampler/sampler.go (2)
  • 172-172: The addition of a nil argument to the SetStatus method call aligns with the updated method signature. This change should be documented, especially the nil argument's purpose and how it might be used in the future.
  • 272-272: Similar to previous instances, the inclusion of a nil argument in the SetStatus method call is consistent with the method's new signature. Ensure this change is well-documented, focusing on the nil argument's intended purpose.
pkg/policies/autoscale/kubernetes/actuators/podscaler/pod-scaler.go (2)
  • 165-165: The SetStatus method now includes an additional nil argument. Ensure that the updated method signature is correctly implemented across all calls to this method.
  • 299-299: The SetStatus method call within the OnStop function of the podScaler struct has been updated to include an additional nil argument. This change aligns with the modifications made to the SetStatus method signature. Ensure consistency in the usage of this updated method across the codebase.
pkg/policies/controlplane/runtime/circuit.go (1)
  • 285-285: The SetStatus method call within the Execute method now includes an additional nil argument. This change should be verified for consistency across all usages of the SetStatus method within the codebase.
Verification successful

The attempt to verify the consistent use of the updated SetStatus method signature with an additional nil argument across the codebase did not yield any results. This outcome suggests that the specific pattern SetStatus($_, $_, nil) was not found elsewhere in the codebase, or there was an issue with the search parameters used.

Given the lack of results, it's prudent to adjust the search parameters to ensure a comprehensive search. This adjustment will aim to capture any usage of SetStatus regardless of the number of arguments, to better understand its usage patterns across the codebase.


Given the lack of results from the adjusted search parameters, it appears that the ast-grep tool did not find any instances of the SetStatus method being used in the codebase, according to the patterns provided. This outcome could be due to several reasons, such as limitations in the search pattern or the absence of the method usage within the accessible code during the search.

To ensure a thorough verification, a different approach using a more general search tool like rg (ripgrep) might provide insight into the usage of SetStatus within the codebase. This tool can help identify any occurrences of SetStatus, regardless of the method signature.


The attempt to use rg (ripgrep) with the --go flag resulted in an error, indicating a misuse of the tool's options. The correct approach does not require specifying the language with --go since rg searches through text files based on the patterns provided without language-specific filtering. To accurately search for occurrences of SetStatus within the codebase, the command should be adjusted to omit the incorrect flag.

Let's correct the command to search for any usage of SetStatus without specifying the language, ensuring a comprehensive search across all Go files by default, given the file extensions.


The search results indicate multiple usages of the SetStatus method across various files in the codebase, with a variety of signatures and contexts. Specifically, the method is used in both Go and C# files, reflecting its application across different parts of the project. The Go usages include calls with nil as an argument, aligning with the change observed in the circuit.go file, as well as other patterns.

Given the diversity in the usage of SetStatus across the codebase, including the presence of the nil argument in several instances, it can be concluded that the change in the Execute method of the Circuit struct to include an additional nil argument is consistent with other usages within the codebase. This suggests that the method's signature may have been updated to accommodate a broader range of scenarios, including those that do not require a specific second argument, hence the nil.

Based on the information gathered, the review comment regarding the need to verify the consistency of the SetStatus method's usage across the codebase has been addressed. The usage of SetStatus with a nil argument in the specified context is consistent with other parts of the codebase.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Ensure the updated SetStatus method signature is used consistently.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'SetStatus($_, $_, nil)'

Length of output: 55



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to capture any usage of SetStatus to understand its usage patterns.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'SetStatus($$$)'

Length of output: 47



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Use rg to search for any usage of SetStatus to ensure comprehensive coverage.
rg 'SetStatus' --go

Length of output: 448



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Correcting the command to search for any usage of SetStatus without the --go flag.
rg 'SetStatus'

Length of output: 11123

pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/concurrency-limiter/concurrency-limiter.go (8)
  • 24-26: Imports for jobs and labelstatus have been added, while the import for errors has been removed. Ensure that these changes are necessary and that the removed import is not used elsewhere in the file.
Verification successful

The verification scripts have confirmed that the errors package is not used within concurrency-limiter.go, aligning with the removal of its import. Additionally, the new imports for jobs and labelstatus are utilized within the file, as evidenced by references to jobs.JobGroup, labelstatus.LabelStatusFactory, and labelstatus.LabelStatus in the provided output. This confirms the necessity of the changes and the correct removal of the unused import.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining usage of the `errors` package.
rg --type go 'errors\.' pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/concurrency-limiter/concurrency-limiter.go
# Verify that the new imports are utilized within the file.
rg --type go '(jobs|labelstatus)\.' pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/concurrency-limiter/concurrency-limiter.go

Length of output: 626

* 76-83: The `concurrencyLimiterFactory` struct now includes `labelStatusJobGroup` and `labelStatusFactory` fields. Confirm that these new fields are properly initialized and used within the factory's methods.
Verification successful

The verification process has confirmed that both labelStatusJobGroup and labelStatusFactory fields within the concurrencyLimiterFactory struct are not only properly initialized but also actively used within the factory's methods. The labelStatusJobGroup is involved in operations such as starting and stopping job groups, as well as being passed to other components for setup. Similarly, labelStatusFactory is utilized to create new instances related to label status management. This demonstrates that the addition of these fields is functional and integrated into the broader logic of the concurrency limiter's implementation.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Ensure that labelStatusJobGroup and labelStatusFactory are initialized and used.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'concurrencyLimiterFactory {
  $$$,
  labelStatusJobGroup: $_,
  labelStatusFactory: $_,
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 1322



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of labelStatusJobGroup and labelStatusFactory within concurrencyLimiterFactory methods
rg "labelStatusJobGroup" ./pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/concurrency-limiter/
rg "labelStatusFactory" ./pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/concurrency-limiter/

Length of output: 2207

* 96-96: The `setupConcurrencyLimiterFactory` function now accepts a `labelStatusFactory` parameter. Verify that this parameter is correctly passed and utilized within the function. * 113-117: Creation of a `labelStatusJobGroup` within `setupConcurrencyLimiterFactory`. Ensure error handling is consistent and that the job group is correctly utilized for label status management. * 201-202: Initialization of `tokensLabelKeyStatus` and `limitByLabelKeyStatus` within the `concurrencyLimiter` struct. Confirm that these label statuses are correctly set up and updated based on limiter decisions. * 254-256: The setup calls for `tokensLabelKeyStatus` and `limitByLabelKeyStatus` within the `setup` function. Ensure that these label statuses are correctly integrated into the concurrency limiter's lifecycle. * 333-339: The decision logic now considers `tokensLabelKey` from request labels. Verify that the `tokensLabelKeyStatus` is correctly updated based on the presence or absence of the `tokensLabelKey` in the request labels.
Verification successful

Given the absence of output from the ast-grep command searching for tokensLabelKeyStatus.SetMissing($$$), it suggests that either the method SetMissing is not called in the context of tokensLabelKeyStatus within the Go codebase, or the pattern used in the ast-grep command did not match the actual implementation due to syntax variations or inaccuracies in the pattern.

To ensure a thorough verification, it's prudent to adjust the search strategy to capture any potential usage of SetMissing related to tokensLabelKeyStatus without relying on the specific pattern that might have been too restrictive or incorrect. Additionally, verifying the presence of tokensLabelKeyStatus and its updates in a broader context could provide a clearer picture of how tokensLabelKey influences its status.


The attempt to use rg with an incorrect flag (--go) resulted in an error, preventing the retrieval of relevant information about tokensLabelKeyStatus. To correct this and effectively search for references to tokensLabelKeyStatus in the Go codebase, the correct approach is to remove the incorrect flag and execute the search again.


The search results confirm that tokensLabelKeyStatus is indeed updated based on the presence or absence of the tokensLabelKey in various components of the codebase, including the concurrency-limiter. Specifically, the method SetMissing() is called on tokensLabelKeyStatus in the context of the concurrency-limiter as well as in other related components (workload-scheduler, rate-limiter, etc.), indicating that the logic for handling the absence of tokensLabelKey is implemented as described.

Based on this evidence, the review comment regarding the verification of tokensLabelKeyStatus being correctly updated based on the presence or absence of the tokensLabelKey in request labels is confirmed to be accurate within the provided context.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for correct updates to tokensLabelKeyStatus based on tokensLabelKey presence.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'tokensLabelKeyStatus.SetMissing($$$)'

Length of output: 69



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any references to tokensLabelKeyStatus and its method calls.
rg "tokensLabelKeyStatus" --go

Length of output: 459



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Correcting the search for any references to tokensLabelKeyStatus and its method calls without the incorrect flag.
rg "tokensLabelKeyStatus"

Length of output: 2916

* 475-476: The `getLimitLabelFromLabels` function now updates `limitByLabelKeyStatus` if the `limitByLabelKey` is not found in the labels. Confirm that this status update is correctly implemented.
pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/rate-limiter/rate-limiter.go (7)
  • 28-28: The import of the labelstatus package aligns with the new functionality for label status management.
  • 86-87: The addition of labelStatusJobGroup and labelStatusFactory fields to the rateLimiterFactory struct is necessary for supporting label status management.
  • 100-100: The inclusion of labelStatusFactory as a parameter in setupRateLimiterFactory is appropriate for initializing label status management within the rate limiter.
  • 125-129: The initialization of labelStatusJobGroup within setupRateLimiterFactory is correctly implemented, ensuring label status tracking is set up properly.
  • 255-256: The addition of tokensLabelKeyStatus and limitByLabelKeyStatus fields to the rateLimiter struct supports the new label status tracking functionality.
  • 385-391: The modifications in the Decide method to handle missing label values using tokensLabelKeyStatus.SetMissing() are correctly implemented, enhancing the label handling logic.
  • 462-462: The update to takeIfAvailable to handle missing label values with limitByLabelKeyStatus.SetMissing() is correctly applied, ensuring consistent label status management.
pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/concurrency-scheduler/concurrency-scheduler.go (6)
  • 26-26: The import of the labelstatus package is necessary for the new label status management functionality in the concurrency scheduler.
  • 82-83: The addition of labelStatusJobGroup and labelStatusFactory fields to the concurrencySchedulerFactory struct is essential for supporting label status management.
  • 97-97: Including labelStatusFactory as a parameter in setupConcurrencySchedulerFactory correctly integrates label status management into the concurrency scheduler setup.
  • 116-120: The initialization of labelStatusJobGroup within setupConcurrencySchedulerFactory is properly implemented, ensuring label status tracking is set up correctly.
  • 237-241: The addition of label status fields like limitByLabelKeyStatus and tokensLabelKeyStatus to the concurrencyScheduler struct supports the new label status tracking functionality effectively.
  • 268-273: The setup of label status instances within the setup method of concurrencyScheduler is correctly implemented, ensuring proper label status management.
pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/quota-scheduler/quota-scheduler.go (5)
  • 28-28: The import of the labelstatus package is necessary for the new label status management functionality in the quota scheduler.
  • 85-86: The addition of labelStatusJobGroup and labelStatusFactory fields to the quotaSchedulerFactory struct is essential for supporting label status management.
  • 100-100: Including labelStatusFactory as a parameter in setupQuotaSchedulerFactory correctly integrates label status management into the quota scheduler setup.
  • 125-129: The initialization of labelStatusJobGroup within setupQuotaSchedulerFactory is properly implemented, ensuring label status tracking is set up correctly.
  • 256-259: The addition of label status fields like tokensLabelKeyStatus and priorityLabelKeyStatus to the quotaScheduler struct supports the new label status tracking functionality effectively.
pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/load-scheduler/load-scheduler.go (5)
  • 22-24: The addition of imports for jobs and labelstatus packages aligns with the new functionality introduced in the loadSchedulerFactory and loadScheduler structs for managing label statuses. This change is necessary for the integration of label status management within the load scheduler component.
  • 83-84: The addition of labelStatusJobGroup and labelStatusFactory fields to the loadSchedulerFactory struct is a significant enhancement. It enables the load scheduler to manage job groups and label statuses, which is crucial for the new policy alert system. This change aligns with the PR's objective to enhance policy alert capabilities and status handling mechanisms across the system.
  • 187-190: Starting the labelStatusJobGroup in the OnStart lifecycle hook is essential for ensuring that the job group is operational before the load scheduler begins processing. This ensures that label status management is active and ready to handle updates as soon as the load scheduler starts, aligning with the system's enhanced policy alert capabilities.
  • 207-210: Stopping the labelStatusJobGroup in the OnStop lifecycle hook is crucial for gracefully shutting down the job group when the load scheduler component is stopped. This ensures that all label status management activities are cleanly terminated, preventing potential resource leaks or incomplete status updates.
  • 264-269: The instantiation of LabelStatus objects for various label keys (tokensLabelKeyStatus, priorityLabelKeyStatus, workloadLabelKeyStatus, fairnessLabelKeyStatus) within the loadScheduler struct is a key enhancement. It enables detailed status management for different aspects of the load scheduling process, such as token allocation and priority handling. This addition significantly improves the system's ability to monitor and respond to policy-related conditions in a granular manner.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2828179 and 840671b.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 840671b and 8b5d4ab.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8b5d4ab and 88dd526.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go (1 hunks)
  • pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/concurrency-scheduler/concurrency-scheduler.go (14 hunks)
  • pkg/policies/flowcontrol/provide.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go
  • pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/concurrency-scheduler/concurrency-scheduler.go
Additional comments: 2
pkg/policies/flowcontrol/provide.go (2)
  • 7-7: The addition of the labelstatus import aligns with the PR's objective to enhance policy alerts and status management across the system. Ensure that the labelstatus module's functionalities are utilized effectively within this package.
  • 26-26: The inclusion of labelstatus.Module() in the Module function's fx.Options is a crucial step for integrating label status management into the flow control policies. This change ensures that the label status functionalities are available for the flow control components, supporting the PR's enhancements for policy alerts and dynamic configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 88dd526 and 83e6eb1.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go

@hasit hasit enabled auto-merge (squash) January 29, 2024 22:03
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 83e6eb1 and 717ca31.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go (1 hunks)
  • pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/workload-scheduler/scheduler.go (7 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go
  • pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/workload-scheduler/scheduler.go

@hasit hasit merged commit 0a35da3 into main Jan 29, 2024
17 of 21 checks passed
@hasit hasit deleted the policy-alerts branch January 29, 2024 22:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants