-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for policy alerts #3168
Conversation
- SetStatus now accepts labels that go along with the alert. Amongst the labels, a special label called "severity" controls the severity of the alert
- concurrency-scheduler - load-scheduler - quota-scheduler - scheduler
WalkthroughThe recent updates primarily focus on enhancing the status tracking system across various components of the project. A notable change is the introduction of an additional argument in Changes
TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 6
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (23)
- pkg/jobs/job-tracker.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/jobs/job.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/notifiers/fx-driver.go (3 hunks)
- pkg/otelcollector/otelcollector.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/platform/platform.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/platform/readiness.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/policies/autoscale/kubernetes/actuators/podscaler/pod-scaler.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/policies/controlplane/components/alerter.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/policies/controlplane/policy-factory.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/policies/controlplane/runtime/circuit.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/concurrency-limiter/concurrency-limiter.go (14 hunks)
- pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/concurrency-scheduler/concurrency-scheduler.go (14 hunks)
- pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/load-scheduler/load-scheduler.go (14 hunks)
- pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/quota-scheduler/quota-scheduler.go (12 hunks)
- pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/rate-limiter/rate-limiter.go (13 hunks)
- pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/sampler/sampler.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/workload-scheduler/scheduler.go (6 hunks)
- pkg/policies/flowcontrol/resources/fluxmeter/flux-meter.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/status/registry.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/status/status_test.go (4 hunks)
- pkg/watchdog/watchdog.go (1 hunks)
- test/aperture_suite_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- pkg/platform/readiness.go
- pkg/policies/controlplane/components/alerter.go
Additional comments: 68
pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go (7)
- 18-21: The
LabelStatusFactory
struct is well-defined with a clear purpose. It holds a reference to astatus.Registry
, which is essential for creatingLabelStatus
instances with specific status management capabilities.- 23-28: The
LabelStatusModule
function correctly provides anfx.Option
for dependency injection, ensuring that theLabelStatusFactory
can be easily integrated into an application using thefx
framework.- 30-34: The
NewLabelStatusFactory
function is correctly implemented to create and return a new instance ofLabelStatusFactory
. It properly initializes theregistry
field with a child registry specific to label status management.- 37-46: The
New
method inLabelStatusFactory
correctly creates a newLabelStatus
instance with the provided label key, policy name, and component ID. It ensures that eachLabelStatus
has its own registry for status management.- 48-56: The
LabelStatus
struct is well-defined, encapsulating the necessary fields for managing the status of labels. It includes synchronization primitives for thread safety, which is a good practice.- 58-79: The
Setup
method inLabelStatus
correctly sets up lifecycle hooks for the label status, registering jobs for setting lookup status. It properly handles job registration and deregistration in theOnStart
andOnStop
hooks, respectively.- 81-86: The
SetMissing
method inLabelStatus
correctly sets the status to missing with the current timestamp. It properly uses a lock to ensure thread safety when updating the timestamp.pkg/jobs/job-tracker.go (1)
- 72-72: The modification to the
updateStatus
method to include an additionalnil
argument in theSetStatus
call aligns with the updated method signature. This change is consistent and correctly implemented.pkg/platform/platform.go (2)
- 167-167: The addition of an extra
nil
argument in theSetStatus
method call within theRun
function is correctly implemented, matching the updated method signature.- 172-172: The modification to include an additional
nil
argument in theSetStatus
call during the platform stopping phase is correctly implemented and aligns with the updated method signature.pkg/jobs/job.go (2)
- 137-137: The addition of an extra
nil
argument in theSetStatus
method call within thedoJob
method is correctly implemented, matching the updated method signature.- 141-141: The modification to include an additional
nil
argument in theSetStatus
call after job completion is correctly implemented and aligns with the updated method signature.pkg/otelcollector/otelcollector.go (1)
- 166-166: The modification to include an additional
nil
argument in theSetStatus
call within thesetReadinessStatus
function is correctly implemented, aligning with the updated method signature.pkg/status/status_test.go (2)
- 38-38: The test cases have been updated to include an additional
nil
argument in theSetStatus
calls, reflecting the changes in the method signature. This ensures that the tests remain valid and accurate.- 101-101: The test cases correctly include an additional
nil
argument in theSetStatus
calls, ensuring that the tests are aligned with the updated method signature.pkg/notifiers/fx-driver.go (8)
- 63-63: The addition of an extra
nil
argument in theSetStatus
method call within theinitApp
function is correctly implemented, matching the updated method signature.- 101-101: The modification to include an additional
nil
argument in theSetStatus
call when handling errors during app initialization is correctly implemented and aligns with the updated method signature.- 108-108: The addition of an extra
nil
argument in theSetStatus
method call within theinitApp
function, indicating the start of the policy runner, is correctly implemented.- 114-114: The modification to include an additional
nil
argument in theSetStatus
call when handling errors during app start is correctly implemented and aligns with the updated method signature.- 120-120: The addition of an extra
nil
argument in theSetStatus
method call within theinitApp
function, indicating the successful start of the policy runner, is correctly implemented.- 122-122: The inclusion of an additional
nil
argument in theSetStatus
call when thefxRunner
is not initialized is correctly implemented, aligning with the updated method signature.- 128-128: The addition of an extra
nil
argument in theSetStatus
method call within thedeinitApp
function, indicating the stopping of the policy runner, is correctly implemented.- 141-141: The modification to include an additional
nil
argument in theSetStatus
call when the policy runner has stopped is correctly implemented and aligns with the updated method signature.pkg/status/registry.go (3)
- 18-18: The update to the
SetStatus
method signature to include an additionalmap[string]string
parameter for labels is a significant change. This allows for more detailed status updates with contextual information.- 180-180: The implementation of the updated
SetStatus
method correctly handles the newlabels
parameter, ensuring that status updates can include additional contextual information.- 190-216: The
createAlert
method has been updated to accept and process an additionallabels
parameter. This enhancement allows for more detailed alerts with contextual information. The method correctly handles theseverity
label and removes it from the labels map before passing it to the alert options, ensuring that the severity is processed separately from other labels.pkg/policies/controlplane/policy-factory.go (2)
- 149-149: The addition of a
nil
argument to theSetStatus
method call aligns with the updated method signature. Ensure that thenil
argument's purpose (likely representing additional context or labels) is correctly handled or documented if it's intended for future use.- 159-159: Similar to the previous comment, the inclusion of a
nil
argument in theSetStatus
method call is consistent with the method's new signature. It's important to verify that this change is properly documented, especially regarding thenil
argument's intended use.test/aperture_suite_test.go (2)
- 199-199: The addition of a
nil
argument to theSetStatus
method call is consistent with the updated method signature. This change should be documented, particularly the rationale behind thenil
argument and how it might be utilized in the future.- 209-209: As with the previous instances, adding a
nil
argument to theSetStatus
method call aligns with the updated method signature. Ensure this change is well-documented, focusing on thenil
argument's intended purpose.pkg/policies/flowcontrol/resources/fluxmeter/flux-meter.go (1)
- 123-123: The inclusion of a
nil
argument in theSetStatus
method call adheres to the updated method signature. It's crucial to document this change, especially thenil
argument's role and potential future applications.pkg/watchdog/watchdog.go (1)
- 178-178: Adding a
nil
argument to theSetStatus
method call is in line with the method's new signature. This modification should be documented, with a particular focus on explaining thenil
argument's intended use.pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/sampler/sampler.go (2)
- 172-172: The addition of a
nil
argument to theSetStatus
method call aligns with the updated method signature. This change should be documented, especially thenil
argument's purpose and how it might be used in the future.- 272-272: Similar to previous instances, the inclusion of a
nil
argument in theSetStatus
method call is consistent with the method's new signature. Ensure this change is well-documented, focusing on thenil
argument's intended purpose.pkg/policies/autoscale/kubernetes/actuators/podscaler/pod-scaler.go (2)
- 165-165: The
SetStatus
method now includes an additionalnil
argument. Ensure that the updated method signature is correctly implemented across all calls to this method.- 299-299: The
SetStatus
method call within theOnStop
function of thepodScaler
struct has been updated to include an additionalnil
argument. This change aligns with the modifications made to theSetStatus
method signature. Ensure consistency in the usage of this updated method across the codebase.pkg/policies/controlplane/runtime/circuit.go (1)
- 285-285: The
SetStatus
method call within theExecute
method now includes an additionalnil
argument. This change should be verified for consistency across all usages of theSetStatus
method within the codebase.Verification successful
The attempt to verify the consistent use of the updated
SetStatus
method signature with an additionalnil
argument across the codebase did not yield any results. This outcome suggests that the specific patternSetStatus($_, $_, nil)
was not found elsewhere in the codebase, or there was an issue with the search parameters used.Given the lack of results, it's prudent to adjust the search parameters to ensure a comprehensive search. This adjustment will aim to capture any usage of
SetStatus
regardless of the number of arguments, to better understand its usage patterns across the codebase.
Given the lack of results from the adjusted search parameters, it appears that the
ast-grep
tool did not find any instances of theSetStatus
method being used in the codebase, according to the patterns provided. This outcome could be due to several reasons, such as limitations in the search pattern or the absence of the method usage within the accessible code during the search.To ensure a thorough verification, a different approach using a more general search tool like
rg
(ripgrep) might provide insight into the usage ofSetStatus
within the codebase. This tool can help identify any occurrences ofSetStatus
, regardless of the method signature.
The attempt to use
rg
(ripgrep) with the--go
flag resulted in an error, indicating a misuse of the tool's options. The correct approach does not require specifying the language with--go
sincerg
searches through text files based on the patterns provided without language-specific filtering. To accurately search for occurrences ofSetStatus
within the codebase, the command should be adjusted to omit the incorrect flag.Let's correct the command to search for any usage of
SetStatus
without specifying the language, ensuring a comprehensive search across all Go files by default, given the file extensions.
The search results indicate multiple usages of the
SetStatus
method across various files in the codebase, with a variety of signatures and contexts. Specifically, the method is used in both Go and C# files, reflecting its application across different parts of the project. The Go usages include calls withnil
as an argument, aligning with the change observed in thecircuit.go
file, as well as other patterns.Given the diversity in the usage of
SetStatus
across the codebase, including the presence of thenil
argument in several instances, it can be concluded that the change in theExecute
method of theCircuit
struct to include an additionalnil
argument is consistent with other usages within the codebase. This suggests that the method's signature may have been updated to accommodate a broader range of scenarios, including those that do not require a specific second argument, hence thenil
.Based on the information gathered, the review comment regarding the need to verify the consistency of the
SetStatus
method's usage across the codebase has been addressed. The usage ofSetStatus
with anil
argument in the specified context is consistent with other parts of the codebase.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Ensure the updated SetStatus method signature is used consistently. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'SetStatus($_, $_, nil)'Length of output: 55
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Broaden the search to capture any usage of SetStatus to understand its usage patterns. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'SetStatus($$$)'Length of output: 47
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use rg to search for any usage of SetStatus to ensure comprehensive coverage. rg 'SetStatus' --goLength of output: 448
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Correcting the command to search for any usage of SetStatus without the --go flag. rg 'SetStatus'Length of output: 11123
pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/concurrency-limiter/concurrency-limiter.go (8)
- 24-26: Imports for
jobs
andlabelstatus
have been added, while the import forerrors
has been removed. Ensure that these changes are necessary and that the removed import is not used elsewhere in the file.Verification successful
The verification scripts have confirmed that the
errors
package is not used withinconcurrency-limiter.go
, aligning with the removal of its import. Additionally, the new imports forjobs
andlabelstatus
are utilized within the file, as evidenced by references tojobs.JobGroup
,labelstatus.LabelStatusFactory
, andlabelstatus.LabelStatus
in the provided output. This confirms the necessity of the changes and the correct removal of the unused import.* 76-83: The `concurrencyLimiterFactory` struct now includes `labelStatusJobGroup` and `labelStatusFactory` fields. Confirm that these new fields are properly initialized and used within the factory's methods.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining usage of the `errors` package. rg --type go 'errors\.' pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/concurrency-limiter/concurrency-limiter.go # Verify that the new imports are utilized within the file. rg --type go '(jobs|labelstatus)\.' pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/concurrency-limiter/concurrency-limiter.goLength of output: 626
Verification successful
The verification process has confirmed that both
labelStatusJobGroup
andlabelStatusFactory
fields within theconcurrencyLimiterFactory
struct are not only properly initialized but also actively used within the factory's methods. ThelabelStatusJobGroup
is involved in operations such as starting and stopping job groups, as well as being passed to other components for setup. Similarly,labelStatusFactory
is utilized to create new instances related to label status management. This demonstrates that the addition of these fields is functional and integrated into the broader logic of the concurrency limiter's implementation.* 96-96: The `setupConcurrencyLimiterFactory` function now accepts a `labelStatusFactory` parameter. Verify that this parameter is correctly passed and utilized within the function. * 113-117: Creation of a `labelStatusJobGroup` within `setupConcurrencyLimiterFactory`. Ensure error handling is consistent and that the job group is correctly utilized for label status management. * 201-202: Initialization of `tokensLabelKeyStatus` and `limitByLabelKeyStatus` within the `concurrencyLimiter` struct. Confirm that these label statuses are correctly set up and updated based on limiter decisions. * 254-256: The setup calls for `tokensLabelKeyStatus` and `limitByLabelKeyStatus` within the `setup` function. Ensure that these label statuses are correctly integrated into the concurrency limiter's lifecycle. * 333-339: The decision logic now considers `tokensLabelKey` from request labels. Verify that the `tokensLabelKeyStatus` is correctly updated based on the presence or absence of the `tokensLabelKey` in the request labels.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Ensure that labelStatusJobGroup and labelStatusFactory are initialized and used. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'concurrencyLimiterFactory { $$$, labelStatusJobGroup: $_, labelStatusFactory: $_, $$$ }'Length of output: 1322
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of labelStatusJobGroup and labelStatusFactory within concurrencyLimiterFactory methods rg "labelStatusJobGroup" ./pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/concurrency-limiter/ rg "labelStatusFactory" ./pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/concurrency-limiter/Length of output: 2207
Verification successful
Given the absence of output from the
ast-grep
command searching fortokensLabelKeyStatus.SetMissing($$$)
, it suggests that either the methodSetMissing
is not called in the context oftokensLabelKeyStatus
within the Go codebase, or the pattern used in theast-grep
command did not match the actual implementation due to syntax variations or inaccuracies in the pattern.To ensure a thorough verification, it's prudent to adjust the search strategy to capture any potential usage of
SetMissing
related totokensLabelKeyStatus
without relying on the specific pattern that might have been too restrictive or incorrect. Additionally, verifying the presence oftokensLabelKeyStatus
and its updates in a broader context could provide a clearer picture of howtokensLabelKey
influences its status.
The attempt to use
rg
with an incorrect flag (--go
) resulted in an error, preventing the retrieval of relevant information abouttokensLabelKeyStatus
. To correct this and effectively search for references totokensLabelKeyStatus
in the Go codebase, the correct approach is to remove the incorrect flag and execute the search again.
The search results confirm that
tokensLabelKeyStatus
is indeed updated based on the presence or absence of thetokensLabelKey
in various components of the codebase, including theconcurrency-limiter
. Specifically, the methodSetMissing()
is called ontokensLabelKeyStatus
in the context of theconcurrency-limiter
as well as in other related components (workload-scheduler
,rate-limiter
, etc.), indicating that the logic for handling the absence oftokensLabelKey
is implemented as described.Based on this evidence, the review comment regarding the verification of
tokensLabelKeyStatus
being correctly updated based on the presence or absence of thetokensLabelKey
in request labels is confirmed to be accurate within the provided context.* 475-476: The `getLimitLabelFromLabels` function now updates `limitByLabelKeyStatus` if the `limitByLabelKey` is not found in the labels. Confirm that this status update is correctly implemented.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for correct updates to tokensLabelKeyStatus based on tokensLabelKey presence. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'tokensLabelKeyStatus.SetMissing($$$)'Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Broaden the search to find any references to tokensLabelKeyStatus and its method calls. rg "tokensLabelKeyStatus" --goLength of output: 459
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Correcting the search for any references to tokensLabelKeyStatus and its method calls without the incorrect flag. rg "tokensLabelKeyStatus"Length of output: 2916
pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/rate-limiter/rate-limiter.go (7)
- 28-28: The import of the
labelstatus
package aligns with the new functionality for label status management.- 86-87: The addition of
labelStatusJobGroup
andlabelStatusFactory
fields to therateLimiterFactory
struct is necessary for supporting label status management.- 100-100: The inclusion of
labelStatusFactory
as a parameter insetupRateLimiterFactory
is appropriate for initializing label status management within the rate limiter.- 125-129: The initialization of
labelStatusJobGroup
withinsetupRateLimiterFactory
is correctly implemented, ensuring label status tracking is set up properly.- 255-256: The addition of
tokensLabelKeyStatus
andlimitByLabelKeyStatus
fields to therateLimiter
struct supports the new label status tracking functionality.- 385-391: The modifications in the
Decide
method to handle missing label values usingtokensLabelKeyStatus.SetMissing()
are correctly implemented, enhancing the label handling logic.- 462-462: The update to
takeIfAvailable
to handle missing label values withlimitByLabelKeyStatus.SetMissing()
is correctly applied, ensuring consistent label status management.pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/concurrency-scheduler/concurrency-scheduler.go (6)
- 26-26: The import of the
labelstatus
package is necessary for the new label status management functionality in the concurrency scheduler.- 82-83: The addition of
labelStatusJobGroup
andlabelStatusFactory
fields to theconcurrencySchedulerFactory
struct is essential for supporting label status management.- 97-97: Including
labelStatusFactory
as a parameter insetupConcurrencySchedulerFactory
correctly integrates label status management into the concurrency scheduler setup.- 116-120: The initialization of
labelStatusJobGroup
withinsetupConcurrencySchedulerFactory
is properly implemented, ensuring label status tracking is set up correctly.- 237-241: The addition of label status fields like
limitByLabelKeyStatus
andtokensLabelKeyStatus
to theconcurrencyScheduler
struct supports the new label status tracking functionality effectively.- 268-273: The setup of label status instances within the
setup
method ofconcurrencyScheduler
is correctly implemented, ensuring proper label status management.pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/quota-scheduler/quota-scheduler.go (5)
- 28-28: The import of the
labelstatus
package is necessary for the new label status management functionality in the quota scheduler.- 85-86: The addition of
labelStatusJobGroup
andlabelStatusFactory
fields to thequotaSchedulerFactory
struct is essential for supporting label status management.- 100-100: Including
labelStatusFactory
as a parameter insetupQuotaSchedulerFactory
correctly integrates label status management into the quota scheduler setup.- 125-129: The initialization of
labelStatusJobGroup
withinsetupQuotaSchedulerFactory
is properly implemented, ensuring label status tracking is set up correctly.- 256-259: The addition of label status fields like
tokensLabelKeyStatus
andpriorityLabelKeyStatus
to thequotaScheduler
struct supports the new label status tracking functionality effectively.pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/load-scheduler/load-scheduler.go (5)
- 22-24: The addition of imports for
jobs
andlabelstatus
packages aligns with the new functionality introduced in theloadSchedulerFactory
andloadScheduler
structs for managing label statuses. This change is necessary for the integration of label status management within the load scheduler component.- 83-84: The addition of
labelStatusJobGroup
andlabelStatusFactory
fields to theloadSchedulerFactory
struct is a significant enhancement. It enables the load scheduler to manage job groups and label statuses, which is crucial for the new policy alert system. This change aligns with the PR's objective to enhance policy alert capabilities and status handling mechanisms across the system.- 187-190: Starting the
labelStatusJobGroup
in theOnStart
lifecycle hook is essential for ensuring that the job group is operational before the load scheduler begins processing. This ensures that label status management is active and ready to handle updates as soon as the load scheduler starts, aligning with the system's enhanced policy alert capabilities.- 207-210: Stopping the
labelStatusJobGroup
in theOnStop
lifecycle hook is crucial for gracefully shutting down the job group when the load scheduler component is stopped. This ensures that all label status management activities are cleanly terminated, preventing potential resource leaks or incomplete status updates.- 264-269: The instantiation of
LabelStatus
objects for various label keys (tokensLabelKeyStatus
,priorityLabelKeyStatus
,workloadLabelKeyStatus
,fairnessLabelKeyStatus
) within theloadScheduler
struct is a key enhancement. It enables detailed status management for different aspects of the load scheduling process, such as token allocation and priority handling. This addition significantly improves the system's ability to monitor and respond to policy-related conditions in a granular manner.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/concurrency-scheduler/concurrency-scheduler.go (14 hunks)
- pkg/policies/flowcontrol/provide.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go
- pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/concurrency-scheduler/concurrency-scheduler.go
Additional comments: 2
pkg/policies/flowcontrol/provide.go (2)
- 7-7: The addition of the
labelstatus
import aligns with the PR's objective to enhance policy alerts and status management across the system. Ensure that thelabelstatus
module's functionalities are utilized effectively within this package.- 26-26: The inclusion of
labelstatus.Module()
in theModule
function'sfx.Options
is a crucial step for integrating label status management into the flow control policies. This change ensures that the label status functionalities are available for the flow control components, supporting the PR's enhancements for policy alerts and dynamic configuration.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/workload-scheduler/scheduler.go (7 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- pkg/labelstatus/labelstatus.go
- pkg/policies/flowcontrol/actuators/workload-scheduler/scheduler.go
Description of change
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
DynamicConfigUpdate
method for more efficient configuration updates.