Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow for modules to extend or duplicate the system's concentration automation #3034

Open
krbz999 opened this issue Feb 12, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@krbz999
Copy link
Contributor

krbz999 commented Feb 12, 2024

Related to #3028.

It would be good if whatever method is created to track concentration was able to be extended such that, for example, an actor could

  • track concentration on two items at the same time.
  • have one 'type' of concentration that is disconnected from regular concentration (example: the Witch class from Valda's Spire of Secrets, which tracks concentration on their hexes separately from spells).

While not part of any official material, it would be good if we made an effort not to directly prevent a module's ability to do this, or better yet exposed the relevant API such that a module could duplicate the automation.

@etiquettestartshere
Copy link
Contributor

While it may not be official official, the Moon Domain Cleric sublcass from Tal’Dorei Campaign Setting Reborn (available on dndbeyond) has "Mind of Two Moons", a divinity feature that allows for a second 'type' of concentration. It would be nice if this feature was supported, or at least not disallowed.

@JPMeehan
Copy link
Contributor

MCDM talent is another example of multi-concentration, as is the official Niv-Mizzet creature.

@JPMeehan JPMeehan mentioned this issue Feb 13, 2024
9 tasks
krbz999 added a commit to krbz999/dnd5e that referenced this issue Mar 1, 2024
krbz999 added a commit to krbz999/dnd5e that referenced this issue Mar 5, 2024
krbz999 added a commit to krbz999/dnd5e that referenced this issue Mar 6, 2024
Fyorl added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants