Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

.github/workflows/pypi-publish.yml: New #285

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

@mkoeppe mkoeppe commented Dec 7, 2024

This new workflow can be invoked manually. It downloads the distributions built by a run of release.yml and uploads them to PyPI. @malb

@malb malb merged commit 2f9e717 into fplll:master Dec 8, 2024
37 checks passed
@malb
Copy link
Collaborator

malb commented Dec 8, 2024

@mkoeppe mkoeppe deleted the pypi-publish branch December 8, 2024 19:04
@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented Dec 8, 2024

The wheels for 0.6.2 were built in https://github.com/fplll/fpylll/actions/runs/12211940430

When https://github.com/fplll/fpylll/actions/workflows/pypi-publish.yml prompts you for the workflow run id, enter 12211940430

@malb
Copy link
Collaborator

malb commented Dec 8, 2024

Thanks. It seems there's a bug in release.yml though in that it produces some "dist/dist" file instead of "dist/fpylll-0.6.2.tar.gz" which PyPi expects. Do you see where it is?

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented Dec 8, 2024

Let's try #286

@malb
Copy link
Collaborator

malb commented Dec 8, 2024

No dice:

 WARNING  `long_description_content_type` missing. defaulting to `text/x-rst`.   
Checking dist/dist: ERROR    InvalidDistribution: Unknown distribution format: 'dist'     

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented Dec 8, 2024

where did this run?

@malb
Copy link
Collaborator

malb commented Dec 9, 2024

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented Dec 9, 2024

This was https://github.com/fplll/fpylll/actions/runs/12224558989/job/34098731609

That run was using 2f9e717, predating the merge of #286

@malb
Copy link
Collaborator

malb commented Dec 9, 2024

Doh! I'm so sorry for the noise. I kept pressing "re-run" but that of course re-ran that commit. Sorry!

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkoeppe commented Dec 9, 2024

No worries. Glad it's working now!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants