-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
dnsmasq ignore br-wan ffuplink_wan #213
Conversation
What is the problem? syslog is spammed by: daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp: DHCP packet received on xxx_wan which has no address What is the expected behaviour? dnsmasq should not care / be silent for 'br-wan ffuplink_wan'
thanks for this patch. I just saw that I tried a similar thing on 2 of my nodes. So not sure if it's better to
from the dnsmasq-manual it's hard to say, which way might have more drawbacks.
From the manual above the Using the here suggested exclude-way, seems at least the less intrusive to the current system. |
Just had a review, but the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Even adding "ffuplink_wan" to the list is not relevant for the tunnelberlin-* uplinks, we can do, as it should not have side-effects on these types.
What is the problem?
syslog is spammed by: daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp: DHCP packet received on xxx_wan which has no address
What is the expected behaviour?
dnsmasq should not care / be silent for 'br-wan ffuplink_wan'
fixes freifunk-berlin/firmware#837