fix: Constrain the minimum bound of pydantic.

[DanCardin]

Alternatively, I could alter your uses of Field() which do not set a default value. But the code as-is appears to be incompatible with pydantic before 1.5, where it raises errors like:

    @all_fields_optional
    class ContainerDeviceRequest(DockerCamelModel):
        driver: str
        count: int
>       device_ids: List[str] = pydantic.Field(alias="DeviceIDs")
E       TypeError: Field() missing 1 required positional argument: 'default'

.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/python_on_whales/components/container/models.py:64: TypeError

Likely for all these cases, the default could be set to ..., but you have a decent number of Field usages, and this seemed less invasive a solution reflecting the current state of the code base.

[gabrieldemarmiesse]

I do agree with the change, thank you for making it :) we don't have the manpower in this project to alter the codebase to support very old versions of python or packages in general so it's better to be stricter with the requirements indeed