Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prepare for releasing 6.5.0 #1338

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 14, 2022
Merged

Prepare for releasing 6.5.0 #1338

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 14, 2022

Conversation

j-rivero
Copy link
Contributor

🎈 Release

Preparation for 6.5.0 release.

Comparison to 6.4.0: ignition-gazebo6_6.4.0...prepare_6_5_0

Checklist

  • Asked team if this is a good time for a release
  • There are no changes to be ported from the previous major version
  • Updated changelog
  • Updated migration guide (as needed)
  • Bumped version in ign-gazebo6-release

Note to maintainers: Remember to use Squash-Merge and edit the commit message to match the pull request summary while retaining Signed-off-by messages.

@j-rivero j-rivero requested a review from chapulina as a code owner February 14, 2022 19:58
@j-rivero j-rivero requested review from iche033 and removed request for chapulina February 14, 2022 19:58
@github-actions github-actions bot added the 🏯 fortress Ignition Fortress label Feb 14, 2022
Changelog.md Outdated
* [Pull request #1240](https://github.com/ignitionrobotics/ign-gazebo/pull/1240)

1. 👩‍🌾 Make depth camera tests more robust (#897)
* [Pull request #897) (#1257](https://github.com/ignitionrobotics/ign-gazebo/pull/897) (#1257)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this looks like a backport to citadel than forward ported. I think this should be released already and we can remove this entry

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changelog.md Outdated
* [Pull request #1324](https://github.com/ignitionrobotics/ign-gazebo/pull/1324)

1. fix buoyancy test by increasing tol
* [Pull request #fix buoyancy test by increasing tol](https://github.com/ignitionrobotics/ign-gazebo/pull/fix buoyancy test by increasing tol)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is from a commit done during a forward port in #1322. We can remove this.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 14, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1338 (1b0906d) into ign-gazebo6 (49d0673) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 1b0906d differs from pull request most recent head fcb02cb. Consider uploading reports for the commit fcb02cb to get more accurate results

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           ign-gazebo6    #1338   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        62.06%   62.06%           
============================================
  Files              278      278           
  Lines            23378    23378           
============================================
  Hits             14510    14510           
  Misses            8868     8868           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 49d0673...fcb02cb. Read the comment docs.

Signed-off-by: Jose Luis Rivero <[email protected]>
@j-rivero j-rivero merged commit 7901903 into ign-gazebo6 Feb 14, 2022
@j-rivero j-rivero deleted the prepare_6_5_0 branch February 14, 2022 22:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🏯 fortress Ignition Fortress
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants