Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optimize job list #102

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 3, 2023
Merged

Optimize job list #102

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 3, 2023

Conversation

seppinho
Copy link
Member

@seppinho seppinho commented Jun 3, 2023

  • Optimize handling of not retired jobs

@seppinho seppinho requested a review from lukfor June 3, 2023 14:06
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #102 (79719d9) into master (e738a40) will increase coverage by 0.31%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #102      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     40.91%   41.23%   +0.31%     
- Complexity     1082     1093      +11     
============================================
  Files           183      183              
  Lines          9030     9029       -1     
  Branches       1111     1109       -2     
============================================
+ Hits           3695     3723      +28     
+ Misses         5045     5017      -28     
+ Partials        290      289       -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...java/cloudgene/mapred/api/v2/admin/GetAllJobs.java 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...rc/main/java/cloudgene/mapred/database/JobDao.java 59.15% <0.00%> (-0.71%) ⬇️

... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@seppinho seppinho merged commit 8c1da06 into master Jun 3, 2023
@seppinho seppinho deleted the features/optimize-job-list branch June 3, 2023 14:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants