Wait for osgeo/gdal tests to complete

[lnicola]

• I agree to follow the project's code of conduct.
• I added an entry to CHANGES.md if knowledge of this change could be valuable to users.

---

Not sure if this was intentional or not, but it seems like a good idea to wait at least for one of those versions.

And we should probably have a policy for which versions we test on.

[jdroenner]

good catch. Maybe the last three minor versions? My current policy is to include the GDAL version in the latest Ubuntu LTS...

[jdroenner]

bors merge

[bors]

Build succeeded:

• ci gdal-32
• ci gdal-32 (--all-features)
• ci gdal-33
• ci gdal-33 (--all-features)
• ci gdal-34
• ci gdal-34 (--all-features)
• ci gdal-35
• ci gdal-35 (--all-features)
• ci ubuntu-lts
• ci ubuntu-lts (--all-features)

[lnicola]

My current policy is to include the GDAL version in the latest Ubuntu LTS...

Sorry, what do you mean?

• that we should test GDAL up to 3.4.1 (from jammy) on CI
• that you try to package GDAL for Debian or Ubuntu so that the LTS picks up the latest version at the time it gets released
• that you're hoping to package newer GDAL versions for Ubuntu LTS after it gets released (which isn't possible AFAIL)
• something else?

[jdroenner]

oh what i mean is that there should be a CI run that uses the same GDAL version as shipped with the latest Ubuntu LTS. We / I mainly work on Ubuntu and therefore this is the most important CI run for me.

There is no real policy which other versions should be tested. We should discuss this. I guess we could remove the CI for GDAL 3.2 at some point...