Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve 3D map support #1780

Closed
10 tasks done
offtherailz opened this issue May 3, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed
10 tasks done

Improve 3D map support #1780

offtherailz opened this issue May 3, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@offtherailz
Copy link
Member

offtherailz commented May 3, 2017

We already introduce a 3D switcher. We should enhance the navigation tool to fit the 3D use case and disable tools that are not supported yet.
Remove tools when 3D mode is enabled:

  • ScaleBox
  • Zoom In
  • Zoom Out
  • Print
  • Locate
  • Shapefile
  • Measure tool

Fixes/Improvements:

  • Attibution is not rendered as html

Tools to Add:

  • Navigation for cesium
  • Hints for navigation
@offtherailz offtherailz self-assigned this May 3, 2017
offtherailz added a commit to offtherailz/MapStore2 that referenced this issue May 4, 2017
offtherailz added a commit that referenced this issue May 5, 2017
* Added credits alternative for cesium baseLayers. See #1780

* add test to TileConfigProvider


* small fix to the map click
offtherailz added a commit to offtherailz/MapStore2 that referenced this issue May 8, 2017
This pull request is a part of geosolutions-it#1780 and hides the following tools when the maptype is cesium:
 - Zoom In/Out
 - ScaleBox
 - Print
 - Locate
 - ShapeFile
 - Measure

It adds the display function as a allowed member of tools in a toolcontainer. If this fuction is present, it will be used to filter the tools to display. the entry. It is useful to hide entries in the ToolContainer other then hiding the window itself.

Also some documentation improved (e.g locate plugin, selectors, external types).
mbarto added a commit to mbarto/MapStore2 that referenced this issue May 8, 2017
@ghost ghost removed the in progress label May 19, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant