Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Functionnal test #288

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 1, 2012
Merged

Functionnal test #288

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 1, 2012

Conversation

bbinet
Copy link
Contributor

@bbinet bbinet commented Mar 30, 2012

test that the output of the samples pelican project is correct

I think it is important to be sure that the output remain unchanged.

@bbinet bbinet mentioned this pull request Mar 30, 2012
@almet
Copy link
Member

almet commented Apr 1, 2012

Yeah, Agreed with you on this point. Pelican shouldn't change its output without us knowing exactly what's going on. Thanks for your work on this!

almet added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2012
@almet almet merged commit 3e288b9 into getpelican:master Apr 1, 2012
@almet
Copy link
Member

almet commented Apr 1, 2012

The tests you introduced are failing on my machine. I don't et exactly why.

Can you give me the steps I should reproduce to run the tests like you are? Thanks!

almet added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2012
This allows everyone to have the same setup when generating the tests. It is
useful for #288 for instance.
@bbinet
Copy link
Contributor Author

bbinet commented Apr 1, 2012

Yes I've noticed that the output was system dependent since it uses the $USER if no author is mentioned in the articles.
I'll try to make a workaround or mock and update the pull request.

@almet
Copy link
Member

almet commented Apr 1, 2012

Cool, also, it could be nice to add instructions to the "how to contribute" page so contributors could regenerate the output if needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants