Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump cnab-go to v0.20.0 #1611

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 4, 2021
Merged

Bump cnab-go to v0.20.0 #1611

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 4, 2021

Conversation

carolynvs
Copy link
Member

Big bump energy

  • jsonschema-lock is finally merged and we can get rid of our fork
  • Allow numbers in bundle.json again
  • Add support for params of type array
  • Add ValidateSchema function
  • Add output validation
  • Validate parameter defaults
  • Validate param regardless of if override or default
  • Fix retrieval of outputs when characters in the result id are in the
    output name
  • Add support for params of object type in ConvertValue (feat(*): mask sensitive values in console output #251)
  • Use alternate canonical json library
  • Bump docker libraries to newer version

@vdice
Copy link
Member

vdice commented Jun 3, 2021

🎉 So excited!

We need to update or remove the cnab-go dependency override here right?

* jsonschema-lock is finally merged and we can get rid of our fork
* Allow numbers in bundle.json again
* Add support for params of type array
* Add ValidateSchema function
* Add output validation
* Validate parameter defaults
* Validate param regardless of if override or default
* Fix retrieval of outputs when characters in the result id are in the
output name
* Add support for params of object type in ConvertValue (getporter#251)
* Use alternate canonical json library
* Bump docker libraries to newer version

Signed-off-by: Carolyn Van Slyck <[email protected]>
@carolynvs
Copy link
Member Author

Oops, it would have helped if all my changes were pushed. I've squashed and force pushed.

@@ -99,7 +99,8 @@
},
"definitions": {
"connstr": {
"type": "string"
"type": "string",
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now that you validate default values, the test started failing because this didn't have a default.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants