-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 213
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add mixin version when building the bundle #1952
Merged
carolynvs
merged 10 commits into
getporter:release/v1
from
joshuabezaleel:1948-bundle-mixin-version
Apr 28, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b5d33aa
Add mixin version when building the bundle
joshuabezaleel 9be0ae6
wip
joshuabezaleel ba4f03e
wip
joshuabezaleel c177412
- Rename Mixins to InstalledMixins
joshuabezaleel b01f49a
Fix unit test
joshuabezaleel a860085
Remove print statement
joshuabezaleel b3a08ac
Fix testfiles
joshuabezaleel 030e951
Retrieve used mixins' version to a function to be reused
joshuabezaleel 57ccdaf
Add mixin version metadata to TestManifestConverter and fix test
joshuabezaleel 0fc6f14
Fix manifest digest
joshuabezaleel File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the way we are concatenating these bytes is already pretty odd but I don't want to have you try to fix that in this PR since it's unrelated. Once your PR is in, I'll submit a PR to clean that up.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it because it was appended byte by byte? Should we transform everything to string first, append it one by one, then cast the finished version of it to
[]byte
at the end?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's just hard to read and when thinking about the digest as a whole, hard to follow what we are hashing here.