Update gfx to the new image view API #1342
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
bors r+ |
bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2021
1342: Update gfx to the new image view API r=kvark a=kvark **Connections** Grabs gfx-rs/gfx#3725 and gfx-rs/gfx#3726 Addresses https://github.com/gfx-rs/wgpu-rs/discussions/868#discussioncomment-633648 **Description** Updates gfx, also improves the error messages for pipeline creation a bit. **Testing** Not really, this is low-risk. Co-authored-by: Dzmitry Malyshau <[email protected]>
|
Build failed: |
|
network error |
|
Build succeeded: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Connections
Grabs gfx-rs/gfx#3725 and gfx-rs/gfx#3726
Addresses https://github.com/gfx-rs/wgpu-rs/discussions/868#discussioncomment-633648
Description
Updates gfx, also improves the error messages for pipeline creation a bit.
Testing
Not really, this is low-risk.