chore: add gnoland init #1050
Closed
chore: add gnoland init #1050
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
📦 🌐 tendermint v2
13 tasks
Signed-off-by: Manfred Touron <[email protected]>
moul-bot
force-pushed
the
dev/moul/gnoland-init
branch
from
0d5d726 to
119fbe4
Compare
7 tasks
|
Superseded by #1605 |
7 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
WIP - HOLD
Update: I'm re-evaluating the initial approach. It might be more coherent to proceed if we restructure
baseappto delineate a 'setup phase' and a 'runtime phase', each with its specific set of variables. Perhaps we should advocate for consistent use of lazy loading. A primary concern I have is with the necessity of passing certain parameters, likemaxCycles, directly toNewApp.Contributors' checklist...
BREAKING CHANGE: xxxmessage was included in the description