chore: reorganize gnovm/cmd/gno

[moul]

• Increase Go-Gno compatibility.
  • Sort alphabetically commands.
  • Move Gno-specific commands under gno tool <command>.
  • Improve ShortHelp.
• Use embedmd in gnovm/cmd/gno's README as an example of how we should use it more frequently.

[Gno2D2]

🛠 PR Checks Summary

🔴 Changes to 'docs' folder must be reviewed/authored by at least one devrel and one tech-staff

Manual Checks (for Reviewers):

• IGNORE the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)

Read More

🤖 This bot helps streamline PR reviews by verifying automated checks and providing guidance for contributors and reviewers.

✅ Automated Checks (for Contributors):

🟢 Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)
🔴 Changes to 'docs' folder must be reviewed/authored by at least one devrel and one tech-staff

☑️ Contributor Actions:

1. Fix any issues flagged by automated checks.
2. Follow the Contributor Checklist to ensure your PR is ready for review.
   • Add new tests, or document why they are unnecessary.
   • Provide clear examples/screenshots, if necessary.
   • Update documentation, if required.
   • Ensure no breaking changes, or include BREAKING CHANGE notes.
   • Link related issues/PRs, where applicable.

☑️ Reviewer Actions:

1. Complete manual checks for the PR, including the guidelines and additional checks if applicable.

📚 Resources:

• Report a bug with the bot.
• View the bot’s configuration file.

Debug

Automated Checks

Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 The pull request was created from a fork (head branch repo: moul/gno)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 Maintainer can modify this pull request

Changes to 'docs' folder must be reviewed/authored by at least one devrel and one tech-staff

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 A changed file matches this pattern: ^docs/ (filename: docs/reference/go-gno-compatibility.md)

Then

🔴 Requirement not satisfied
└── 🔴 And
    ├── 🟢 Or
    │   ├── 🟢 Pull request author is a member of the team: tech-staff
    │   └── 🟢 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull request(with state "APPROVED")
    └── 🔴 Or
        ├── 🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: devrels
        └── 🔴 At least 1 user(s) of the team devrels reviewed pull request(with state "APPROVED")

Manual Checks

**IGNORE** the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 On every pull request

Can be checked by

• Any user with comment edit permission

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[gfanton]

Looks good. It will probably break compatibility with some current extension tools that use gno lint. If merged, I think it would be worth mentioning this to contributors.

[gfanton]

I think it's important to note that it includes import by default compared to the original go fmt, so it will try to format and resolve dependencies. (It should not fail)

[gfanton]

we should mention it here as well

[thehowl]

I agree to move transpile, it is not useful enough to be a top-level command; though I'm unsure about lint, it seems more useful in the day-to-day and go tool lint seems cumbersome. repl, I think ideally it could just be either a) the default behaviour of gno run without arguments or b) something you enable in gno run with a flag (so you could possibly also have a repl working on top of an existing package.