Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use MAINTAINERS file in repository in CONTRIBUTING #1489

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 18, 2017

Conversation

sapk
Copy link
Member

@sapk sapk commented Apr 12, 2017

because teams are not publicly available.

I just change maintainer link and not advisor one since there is no file for it.

@strk
Copy link
Member

strk commented Apr 14, 2017 via email

@tboerger tboerger added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Apr 14, 2017
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ The current release cycle is aligned to start on December 25 to February 24, nex

## Maintainers

To make sure every PR is checked, we have [team maintainers](https://github.com/orgs/go-gitea/teams/maintainers). Every PR **MUST** be reviewed by at least two maintainers (or owners) before it can get merged. A maintainer should be a contributor of Gitea (or Gogs) and contributed at least 4 accepted PRs. A contributor should apply as a maintainer in the [Gitter develop channel](https://gitter.im/go-gitea/develop). The owners or the team maintainers may invite the contributor. A maintainer should spend some time on code reviews. If a maintainer has no time to do that, they should apply to leave the maintainers team and we will give them the honor of being a member of the [advisors team](https://github.com/orgs/go-gitea/teams/advisors). Of course, if an advisor has time to code review, we will gladly welcome them back to the maintainers team. If a maintainer is inactive for more than 3 months and forgets to leave the maintainers team, the owners may move him or her from the maintainers team to the advisors team.
To make sure every PR is checked, we have [team maintainers](MAINTAINERS). Every PR **MUST** be reviewed by at least two maintainers (or owners) before it can get merged. A maintainer should be a contributor of Gitea (or Gogs) and contributed at least 4 accepted PRs. A contributor should apply as a maintainer in the [Gitter develop channel](https://gitter.im/go-gitea/develop). The owners or the team maintainers may invite the contributor. A maintainer should spend some time on code reviews. If a maintainer has no time to do that, they should apply to leave the maintainers team and we will give them the honor of being a member of the [advisors team](https://github.com/orgs/go-gitea/teams/advisors). Of course, if an advisor has time to code review, we will gladly welcome them back to the maintainers team. If a maintainer is inactive for more than 3 months and forgets to leave the maintainers team, the owners may move him or her from the maintainers team to the advisors team.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please link absolutely to the master branch

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

like ../master/MAINTAINERS ?

Copy link
Member Author

@sapk sapk Apr 14, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All relative link don't use reference to branch like : [DCO](DCO) or [CONTRIBUTING](CONTRIBUTING.md). And the goal to use relative was to make it available offline. I don't think that ../master/MAINTAINERS would work outside github.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Using an absolute link makes sure somebody is looking to the real source. Only the file on the master branch is valid

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sapk I agree with @tboerger and disagree with @strk. Since all other links here are absolute link, why make a relative link specially on this one?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All link that refer to local file are relative in the doc like : [DCO](DCO) or [CONTRIBUTING](CONTRIBUTING.md).
Personally, I have a little preference to relative link since it would work "offline" and it is not really important if your local copy is outdated because you know that your local copy reflect a historical version.
But relative link is also good and I understand the point of always refer to last version.
Maybe a vote is needed?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK.

@lunny lunny added this to the 1.2.0 milestone Apr 14, 2017
@lunny lunny added the type/docs This PR mainly updates/creates documentation label Apr 14, 2017
@strk
Copy link
Member

strk commented Apr 14, 2017 via email

@andreynering
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Apr 16, 2017
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Apr 18, 2017

LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Apr 18, 2017
@appleboy appleboy merged commit 941281a into go-gitea:master Apr 18, 2017
@sapk sapk deleted the use-MAINTAINERS-file branch April 28, 2017 10:03
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 23, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/docs This PR mainly updates/creates documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants