Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix bug when read public repo lfs file #5912

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 31, 2019
Merged

Fix bug when read public repo lfs file #5912

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 31, 2019

Conversation

lunny
Copy link
Member

@lunny lunny commented Jan 31, 2019

will fix #5657

@lunny lunny added the type/bug label Jan 31, 2019
@lunny lunny added this to the 1.8.0 milestone Jan 31, 2019
@lunny lunny mentioned this pull request Jan 31, 2019
Merged
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 31, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #5912 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5912      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   37.96%   37.98%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         329      329              
  Lines       48404    48405       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits        18378    18386       +8     
+ Misses      27385    27378       -7     
  Partials     2641     2641
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
modules/lfs/server.go 44.41% <100%> (+0.13%) ⬆️
models/repo_list.go 63.29% <0%> (-1.27%) ⬇️
routers/repo/view.go 47.3% <0%> (+1.19%) ⬆️
modules/process/manager.go 81.15% <0%> (+4.34%) ⬆️
models/unit.go 14.28% <0%> (+14.28%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0823791...2c179de. Read the comment docs.

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Jan 31, 2019
zeripath
zeripath approved these changes Jan 31, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@zeripath zeripath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I must have looked at this so many times and missed this. Might be worth sticking a comment in to say users don't necessarily need to be signed in - check for anonymous actress

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Jan 31, 2019
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Jan 31, 2019
@lunny
Copy link
Member Author

lunny commented Jan 31, 2019

@zeripath done.

@zeripath zeripath merged commit bbad9b6 into go-gitea:master Jan 31, 2019
@lunny lunny deleted the lunny/lfs_permission branch January 31, 2019 13:38
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@kolaente kolaente kolaente approved these changes

@zeripath zeripath zeripath approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.8.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1.7.0 lfs regression
5 participants
@lunny @codecov-io @zeripath @kolaente @GiteaBot