Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Update vrp.md: add kernelCTF-related changes, remove kernel-specific …
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…details
  • Loading branch information
koczkatamas committed Jun 29, 2023
1 parent 818e3b6 commit 8163dde
Showing 1 changed file with 8 additions and 46 deletions.
54 changes: 8 additions & 46 deletions docs/vrp.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
# kCTF VRP Setup

We invite you to demonstrate an exploit against our kCTF demo cluster based on the challenges presented on this page. Successful demonstrations are eligible for rewards between [20,000 - 91,337 USD](https://security.googleblog.com/2022/02/roses-are-red-violets-are-blue-giving.html) as defined in [https://g.co/vrp](https://g.co/vrp). On top of this, exploiting our [new instances](#experimental-mitigations-challenge) are eligible up to 42,000 USD, increasing the total possible payout to [133,337 USD](https://security.googleblog.com/2022/08/making-linux-kernel-exploit-cooking.html).
We invite you to demonstrate an exploit against our kCTF demo cluster based on the challenges presented on this page. Successful demonstrations which don't use Linux kernel vulnerabilities are eligible for rewards as described in our [kCTF VRP announcement blog post](https://security.googleblog.com/2020/05/expanding-our-work-with-open-source.html).

**Important note:** If you'd like to demonstrate an exploit against a Linux kernel vulnerability, please submit it to [our kernelCTF program](https://google.github.io/security-research/kernelctf/rules.html). **kCTF VRP does not accept Linux kernel vulnerabilities anymore** since 2023-06-14. For more information read our blog post "[Learnings from kCTF VRP's 42 Linux kernel exploits submissions](https://security.googleblog.com/2023/06/learnings-from-kctf-vrps-42-linux.html)".

[kCTF](https://github.com/google/kctf) is an open source infrastructure for CTF competitions. You can find details on how it works in the [kCTF documentation](https://google.github.io/kctf/introduction.html), but in short, it’s running on a hardened Kubernetes cluster with the following security features:

Expand All @@ -26,19 +28,19 @@ You can find the code for the challenges

The “kctf” challenge is the only entry point to the cluster. You can connect to it via:

**Older cluster (running Linux 5.10 currently):**
**Older cluster (GKE Regular release channel):**
```
socat FILE:`tty`,raw,echo=0 TCP:kctf.vrp.ctfcompetition.com:1337
```

**Newer cluster (running Linux 5.15 currently):**
**Newer cluster (GKE Rapid release channel):**
```
socat FILE:`tty`,raw,echo=0 TCP:kctf.vrp2.ctfcompetition.com:1337
```

It will ask you to solve a proof-of-work and then gives you access to a bash running in a setup similar to the [kCTF pwn template challenge](https://github.com/google/kctf/tree/beta/dist/challenge-templates/pwn). The only difference is that the flag is not accessible inside of the nsjail sandbox and you will need to break out of the chroot in order to read it. You can observe the full source code [here](https://github.com/google/google-ctf/tree/master/vrp).

The details of the kernel of the VM can be read from `/etc/node-os-release`, and you can get the image of the VM following [this script](https://gist.github.com/sirdarckcat/568934df2b33a125b0b0f42a5366df8c) based on the output of `/etc/node-os-release`.
The details of the environment of the VM can be read from `/etc/node-os-release`, and you can get the image of the VM following [this script](https://gist.github.com/sirdarckcat/568934df2b33a125b0b0f42a5366df8c) based on the output of `/etc/node-os-release`.


## full-chain challenge
Expand All @@ -58,62 +60,22 @@ KCTF{$CHAL_NAME-$TIMESTAMP:$MAC}

As you can see, the flags include a timestamp and are rotated frequently.

## Experimental mitigations challenge

We’re [launching new instances](https://security.googleblog.com/2022/08/making-linux-kernel-exploit-cooking.html) to evaluate the latest Linux kernel stable image as well as new experimental mitigations in a custom kernel we've built. Rather than simply learning about the current state of the stable kernels, the new instances are used to ask the community to help us evaluate the value of both our latest and more experimental security mitigations.

The [mitigations](https://github.com/thejh/linux/blob/slub-virtual/MITIGATION_README) we've built attempt to tackle the following exploit primitives:
* Out-of-bounds write on slab
* Cross-cache attacks
* Elastic objects
* Freelist corruption

You can connect to the instance with the latest kernel without the patch via

```
nc kctf-mitigation.vrp.ctfcompetition.com 1337
```

And to the version patched with our experimental mitigations:

```
nc kctf-mitigation.vrp.ctfcompetition.com 31337
```

(Previous kernel version 5.19 with the mitigation is available at `nc kctf-mitigation.vrp.ctfcompetition.com 31338`, but please do not use that for new research.)

These instances are not based on the kCTF infrastructure (as they require running custom kernel version), instead they spin up a new QEMU VM on every new connection. As this is not a production-ready infrastructure, breaking the infrastructure itself (or e.g. using leaks from console) is not considered a valid submission.

| | Upstream | Custom mitigation |
| -------------- | -------- | ----------------- |
| Kernel version | 6.1.25 | 6.1.25 - custom |
| Kernel image | [bzImage_upstream_6.1.25](https://storage.googleapis.com/kctf-vrp-public-files/bzImage_upstream_6.1.25) | [bzImage_mitigation_6.1.25](https://storage.googleapis.com/kctf-vrp-public-files/bzImage_mitigation_6.1.25) |
| Kernel config | [bzImage_upstream_6.1.25_config](https://storage.googleapis.com/kctf-vrp-public-files/bzImage_upstream_6.1.25_config) | [bzImage_mitigation_6.1.25_config](https://storage.googleapis.com/kctf-vrp-public-files/bzImage_mitigation_6.1.25_config) |
| Source code | [f17b0ab](https://github.com/thejh/linux/commit/f17b0ab65d17988d5e6d6fe22f708ef3721080bf) | [a87ad16](https://github.com/thejh/linux/commit/a87ad16046f6f7fd61080ebfb93753366466b761) |
| Port | 1337 | 31337 |
| Reward (base) | $21000 | $42000 |

Please also note that although we are trying to keep up-to-date with the latest kernel version, these instances may sometimes be outdated.

### Submission

We want to avoid learning about unfixed vulnerabilities, so the process to submit reports is:
1. Test your exploit - we recommend you to test it locally first, and run a GKE cluster to debug.
2. If it is a 0day (there's no patch for it on [linus master branch](https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/master) yet), then send us a checksum of your working exploit to our form [here](https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeQf6aWmIIjtG4sbEKfgOBK0KL3zzeHCrsgA1EcPr-xsFAk7w/viewform). You won't share any technical details about the vulnerability, you will just record the fact you found something (as we only reward the first person that writes an exploit for a given bug, we use it to resolve the timing in case of an exploit collision). Make sure to submit the exploit checksum **before** there's a public patch and to submit the full exploit **within a week** after the patch is public. If you take longer than a week, we might issue the reward to someone else.
2. If it is a 0day (there's no patch for it yet), then send us a checksum of your working exploit to our form [here](https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeQf6aWmIIjtG4sbEKfgOBK0KL3zzeHCrsgA1EcPr-xsFAk7w/viewform). You won't share any technical details about the vulnerability, you will just record the fact you found something (as we only reward the first person that writes an exploit for a given bug, we use it to resolve the timing in case of an exploit collision). Make sure to submit the exploit checksum **before** there's a public patch and to submit the full exploit **within a week** after the patch is public. If you take longer than a week, we might issue the reward to someone else.
3. For 1days or once there is a public patch, test your exploit it on the [lab environment](#kctf-challenge). If you have troubles let us know in [#kctf](https://discord.gg/V8UqnZ6JBG) and we'll help you figure out any problems.
4. Once you get the flag, send it together with the patch and the exploit [here](https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeQf6aWmIIjtG4sbEKfgOBK0KL3zzeHCrsgA1EcPr-xsFAk7w/viewform).
5. To increase the timely sharing of new techniques with the community, we are also now requiring that the exploits that receive innovation bonus get publicly documented within a month, otherwise we may publish it.

### Notes

We want to encourage the community to help research vulnerabilities such as those [found by Syzkaller](https://syzkaller.appspot.com/upstream#open), but which are still unfixed since they have not been shown to be exploitable. As such:


We want to encourage the community to help research vulnerabilities, but which are still unfixed since they have not been shown to be exploitable. As such:

* The person that develops the exploit and receives the reward might not be the same as the person that discovered or patched the vulnerability.
* It's ok to use 1-day exploits against the lab environment using publicly known vulnerabilities that exploit the patch gap between the time when a patch is announced and the lab environment is updated, however we will only issue a single reward per vulnerability.


**When we receive an exploit for a fixed vulnerability we'll add details [here](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vS1REdTA29OJftst8xN5B5x8iIUcxuK6bXdzF8G1UXCmRtoNsoQ9MbebdRdFnj6qZ0Yd7LwQfvYC2oF/pubhtml).**

In case of questions or suggestions, you can reach us in [#kctf](https://discord.gg/V8UqnZ6JBG).

0 comments on commit 8163dde

Please sign in to comment.