Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inlined storage/sql.go into both implementations that use it #3235

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 7, 2023

Conversation

mhutchinson
Copy link
Contributor

This removes an obstacle to executing #3201 cleanly. Despite the duplication, it's also logically cleaner. The different backend implementations should be able to evolve independently. Tying them together with common code for reading rows forces the same schema layout across all implementations.

This removes an obstacle to executing google#3201 cleanly. Despite the duplication, it's also logically cleaner. The different backend implementations should be able to evolve independently. Tying them together with common code for reading rows forces the same schema layout across all implementations.
@mhutchinson mhutchinson requested a review from a team as a code owner December 6, 2023 10:54
@AlCutter AlCutter requested a review from JAORMX December 7, 2023 13:34
@mhutchinson mhutchinson merged commit ccb593b into google:master Dec 7, 2023
10 checks passed
@mhutchinson mhutchinson deleted the inlinesql branch December 7, 2023 14:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants