Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: improve artisan db:show,db:table command display information #801

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 31, 2024

Conversation

almas1992
Copy link
Contributor

@almas1992 almas1992 commented Dec 31, 2024

📑 Description

  • Adding table comments, collation, and engine details to the output.
  • Changing table size units from MiB to MB for better readability.
  • Enhancing column type and index type displays for clarity.
  • Improving MariaDB version output for consistency.

Screenshot

image

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added Collation and Engine fields to the Table struct
    • Enhanced database table information display with more details like table comment, engine, and collation
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated size measurement display from "MiB" to "MB" across multiple commands and tests
  • Documentation

    • Improved output formatting for database table and console commands to provide more comprehensive information

✅ Checks

  • Added test cases for my code

@almas1992 almas1992 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 31, 2024 03:28
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces enhancements to the database schema and console output across multiple files. The primary changes include adding new fields (Collation and Engine) to the Table struct in the schema definition, and updating the display formatting of database and table information from "MiB" to "MB". The modifications improve the detail and representation of database table metadata, expanding the schema's capabilities and refining the console output for better user information.

Changes

File Change Summary
contracts/database/schema/schema.go Added Collation and Engine fields to Table struct
database/console/show_command.go Updated size formatting from "MiB" to "MB"
database/console/show_command_test.go Updated test expectations for version and size representation
database/console/table_command.go Enhanced table information display, including comment, engine, and collation details
database/console/table_command_test.go Updated test expectations to match new table and column metadata display

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • devhaozi

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b202f13 and 8cc2c85.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • contracts/database/schema/schema.go (1 hunks)
  • database/console/show_command.go (2 hunks)
  • database/console/show_command_test.go (2 hunks)
  • database/console/table_command.go (2 hunks)
  • database/console/table_command_test.go (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • database/console/show_command.go
🔇 Additional comments (17)
database/console/table_command.go (7)

104-104: Enhanced table detail output.

Displaying the table comment alongside its name provides helpful context to users. Ensure that comments are properly sanitized to prevent potential display issues.


106-106: Switched from MiB to MB.

This aligns with more common usage and improves readability. No issues found here.


107-112: Conditional display of engine and collation.

These checks ensure only relevant details are displayed. Make sure to handle any edge cases where engine or collation data may be invalid or unavailable.


119-119: Correct usage of column type.

The change to reference the precise type (including size, e.g., int(11)) is beneficial for clarity, ensuring the displayed data matches the actual schema definition.


125-125: Appending the column's TypeName.

Attaching the TypeName to the attributes fosters readability, letting users quickly see the logical type. This complements the newly displayed full type in line 119.


129-131: Collation detail for columns.

Conditionally appending the column collation in the list of attributes is a neat detail. Watch for edge cases where certain column types may not support collations.


143-143: Index type attribute.

Initializing the attributes array with the index type is consistent with the new approach of providing more schema details. This helps users see the chosen index type at a glance.

database/console/show_command_test.go (3)

33-33: Updated MariaDB label.

The test now references “test-version” for improved distinction. This is correct as it allows verifying custom or non-default version strings.


40-41: Consistent size unit.

Switching from "MiB" to "MB" aligns with the new display convention. Good job updating the test expectations to match the code changes.


119-119: Simulating custom version in test.

Assigning "test-version-MariaDB" ensures flexibility in the tested version string. This verifies the code’s ability to parse and display versions consistently.

database/console/table_command_test.go (6)

28-32: Improved table details in test.

The test now checks for table comment, engine, and collation data, reflecting the new display logic. This ensures robust coverage for the introduced schema fields.


34-35: Enhanced column detail checks.

Verifying autoincrement, nullable, and collation attributes adds valuable coverage. This ensures that a wide array of column properties is correctly shown.


37-37: Index detail test.

Including index type as “btree” and verifying compound/unique/primary constraints thoroughly validates the new indexing logic.


132-134: Extended table struct usage.

Retrieving and checking the extra fields (Comment, Collation, Engine) ensures that the new schema data is properly tested end-to-end.


138-139: Testing column properties thoroughly.

Adding collation, default values, and logical types ensures coverage for multiple aspects of columns, demonstrating the command’s broader scope.


142-142: Index type coverage.

This test includes “btree” for indexes and multiple columns, verifying that compound and unique/primary flags are correctly displayed.

contracts/database/schema/schema.go (1)

132-137: New fields in Table struct.

Introducing Collation and Engine extends the schema’s capabilities, allowing more comprehensive database metadata to be stored and displayed.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.75%. Comparing base (b202f13) to head (8cc2c85).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #801      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   69.73%   69.75%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         218      218              
  Lines       18866    18876      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits        13157    13167      +10     
  Misses       4991     4991              
  Partials      718      718              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Amazing, wondering what will be printed if one line isn't enough.

@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl merged commit 5f335b1 into goravel:master Dec 31, 2024
12 checks passed
@almas1992
Copy link
Contributor Author

Amazing, wondering what will be printed if one line isn't enough.

If the terminal width isn’t wide enough to display the text, it will wrap, and the layout might get messed up.😂

@hwbrzzl
Copy link
Contributor

hwbrzzl commented Dec 31, 2024

Yes, should not be a big problem, if one line is not enough, please upgrade your screen. 😂

@almas1992
Copy link
Contributor Author

Amazing, wondering what will be printed if one line isn't enough.

Maybe I can detect the terminal width and hide some extra information like type hints, collation, foreign key fields, etc., if the width isn’t sufficient?

@almas1992
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, should not be a big problem, if one line is not enough, please upgrade your screen. 😂

Totally agree! If your screen can’t handle it, it’s time for an upgrade! 😉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants