fixed tiny typo to add an R #181
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@huwd can you help us merge this simple typo change to the tech docs pls |
|
Yep, right that's it gonna get an adjustment to code-owners up now. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
Small change to fix a typo and therefore improve accuracy
What
In secure your authorisation request parameters with JWT, it refers to YOU_REQUEST_OBJECT where it should be YOUR_REQUEST_OBJECT
Technical writer support
Yes - needs a sanity check that I've updated it in the right place
How to review
Look at the files changed and check how it looks when ran locally