Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[tempo-distributed] add ingress with no gateway #3231

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DrFaust92
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #3001

@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 force-pushed the tempo-ingress-no-gateway branch from 41dbc9b to 24a54a5 Compare July 18, 2024 22:10
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 marked this pull request as ready for review July 18, 2024 22:21
Copy link
Collaborator

@Sheikh-Abubaker Sheikh-Abubaker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey there @DrFaust92 Thanks for the contribution! Have you tested it ?

@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 force-pushed the tempo-ingress-no-gateway branch 2 times, most recently from 418e8fd to f26ae6f Compare August 4, 2024 01:03
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 marked this pull request as draft August 4, 2024 01:44
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 marked this pull request as ready for review August 4, 2024 02:22
@DrFaust92
Copy link
Contributor Author

yes, Sheikh-Abubaker. one "problem" is there is no way to add paths that mutate path on the backend, i.e. /jaeger/api/traces -> /api/traces, /zipkin/spans -> /spans

@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 force-pushed the tempo-ingress-no-gateway branch from a699c5c to 51392a9 Compare August 8, 2024 17:07
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 force-pushed the tempo-ingress-no-gateway branch from 4b7a40f to 8e8d5a1 Compare August 15, 2024 21:38
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 force-pushed the tempo-ingress-no-gateway branch from 8e8d5a1 to 9d7493f Compare August 25, 2024 20:00
@zanhsieh
Copy link
Collaborator

@Sheikh-Abubaker Can you review and / or merge this pr plz?

@Sheikh-Abubaker
Copy link
Collaborator

@Sheikh-Abubaker Can you review and / or merge this pr plz?

@zanhsieh I am travelling, I'll try do it if I get time.

@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 force-pushed the tempo-ingress-no-gateway branch from 60ee3eb to 44f34c3 Compare September 7, 2024 02:52
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 force-pushed the tempo-ingress-no-gateway branch from 44f34c3 to 6cc2fdb Compare September 7, 2024 02:53
@DrFaust92
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sheikh-Abubaker Can you take a look at this? is it worth rebasing?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[tempo-distributed] Pure ingress without gateway
3 participants