Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Read-write mode integration test improvements #3433

Closed

Conversation

charleskorn
Copy link
Contributor

@charleskorn charleskorn commented Nov 11, 2022

What this PR does

Builds on #3423.

Adds a fix for a race condition and verification of the range query response.

If the changes for the range query look good, I'll apply them to the other integration tests, as per @pracucci's suggestion in #3423 (comment).

Which issue(s) this PR fixes or relates to

#3363

Checklist

  • [n/a] Tests updated
  • [n/a] Documentation added
  • [n/a] CHANGELOG.md updated - the order of entries should be [CHANGE], [FEATURE], [ENHANCEMENT], [BUGFIX]

…ion.

Without this change, the test occasionally fails due to errors like
"expanding series: empty ring" when querying for data, which is caused
by querying before all three instances have joined the memberlist
cluster.
@charleskorn charleskorn force-pushed the read-write-mode-integration-test-improvements branch from ddf7e0d to 1002806 Compare November 11, 2022 05:42
@charleskorn charleskorn marked this pull request as ready for review November 11, 2022 05:42
@charleskorn charleskorn requested a review from a team as a code owner November 11, 2022 05:42
Copy link
Collaborator

@pracucci pracucci left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for working on this! You're doing great. Keep going on...

@charleskorn
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've split this into #3447 and #3448 to make it easier to review.

@charleskorn charleskorn deleted the read-write-mode-integration-test-improvements branch November 18, 2022 17:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants