Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch ingester limiter to use ingesterRing rather than lifecycler #7440

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 22, 2024

Conversation

pr00se
Copy link
Contributor

@pr00se pr00se commented Feb 21, 2024

What this PR does

Changes the ingester limiter to get information about the ingester ring from the ring.Ring rather than the lifecycler, to avoid issues with calling the limiter before the lifecycler is started (e.g.: during ingester startup, before the lifecycler is started).

Which issue(s) this PR fixes or relates to

Relates to #7411

Checklist

  • Tests updated.
  • Documentation added.
  • CHANGELOG.md updated - the order of entries should be [CHANGE], [FEATURE], [ENHANCEMENT], [BUGFIX].
  • about-versioning.md updated with experimental features.

@pr00se pr00se marked this pull request as ready for review February 21, 2024 22:53
@pr00se pr00se requested a review from a team as a code owner February 21, 2024 22:53
Copy link
Member

@pstibrany pstibrany left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you. Lgtm. I've updated code slightly to remove the ring wrapper, and will merge on green.

Copy link
Collaborator

@pracucci pracucci left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@pstibrany pstibrany merged commit 9122b70 into main Feb 22, 2024
28 checks passed
@pstibrany pstibrany deleted the limiter-use-ring branch February 22, 2024 15:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants