feat: update some contracts to use solidity 0.8

[pcarranzav]

experimental / WIP, take this with a bucketful of salt, might not work, etc

[socket-security]

Socket Security Report

Dependency issues detected. If you merge this pull request, you will not be alerted to the instances of these issues again.

📜 New install scripts detected

A dependency change in this PR is introducing new install scripts to your install step.

Package	Script field	Location
[email protected] (added)	binding.gyp	package.json via @nomicfoundation/[email protected], [email protected]
[email protected] (added)	install	package.json via @nomicfoundation/[email protected], [email protected]
[email protected] (upgraded)	postinstall	package.json

🫣 Native code

Contains native code which could be a vector to obscure malicious code, and generally decrease the likelihood of reproducible or reliable installs.

Package	Location
[email protected] (added)	package.json via @nomicfoundation/[email protected], [email protected]

😵‍💫 Bin script confusion

This package has multiple bin scripts with the same name. This can cause non-deterministic behavior when installing or could be a sign of a supply chain attack.

Package	Bin script	Location
@nomicfoundation/[email protected] (added)	rlp	package.json
[email protected] (added)	rlp	package.json via [email protected], @ethereum-waffle/[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
[email protected] (added)	rlp	package.json

Socket.dev scan summary

Issue	Status
Did you mean?	✅ no new possible package typos
Install scripts	⚠️ 3 new install scripts detected
Telemetry	✅ no new telemetry
Troll package	✅ no new troll packages
Malware	✅ no new malware
Native code	⚠️ 1 new native module detected
Bin Script Confusion	⚠️ 3 new bin script confusions detected
Bin script shell injection	✅ no new bin script shell injection

Bot Commands

To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore followed by a space separated list of package-name@version specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected] [email protected]

• @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore @nomicfoundation/[email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected]

Powered by socket.dev

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 91.56% // Head: 91.54% // Decreases project coverage by -0.02% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (fc7120d) compared to base (263355d).
Patch coverage: 88.97% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                    Coverage Diff                    @@
##           pcv/l2-linear-rewards     #725      +/-   ##
=========================================================
- Coverage                  91.56%   91.54%   -0.03%     
=========================================================
  Files                         42       42              
  Lines                       2003     1998       -5     
  Branches                     350      350              
=========================================================
- Hits                        1834     1829       -5     
  Misses                       169      169              

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	91.54% <88.97%> (-0.03%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
contracts/base/Multicall.sol	100.00% <ø> (ø)
contracts/curation/GraphCurationToken.sol	100.00% <ø> (ø)
contracts/discovery/ServiceRegistry.sol	100.00% <ø> (ø)
contracts/discovery/SubgraphNFTDescriptor.sol	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ontracts/discovery/erc1056/EthereumDIDRegistry.sol	0.00% <ø> (ø)
contracts/gateway/BridgeEscrow.sol	100.00% <ø> (ø)
contracts/gateway/GraphTokenGateway.sol	100.00% <ø> (ø)
contracts/governance/Controller.sol	100.00% <ø> (ø)
contracts/governance/Governed.sol	100.00% <ø> (ø)
contracts/governance/GraphGovernance.sol	100.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 32 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.