-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
Agreement to license change (from LGPL to MIT) #20
Comments
I'll reconfirm it here for the record. |
I give permission for all my work on rgtk to be re-licensed under an MIT license. |
I give my permission. |
I agree with re-licensing my contribution(s) under an MIT license. |
I agree with re-licensing my contribution(s) under an MIT license. Just because I'm curious, what are the reasons for this change? GTK+ is LGPL licensed, I think you still have to conform to its terms even if the bindings are MIT. But IANAL. |
We're only using the information from GTK's header files so this work isn't supposed to be infected by [L]GPL. We likely still are required to put the text of those licences into the repo and some notices. |
MIT sounds good to me. Permission granted of course. |
@ptersilie: thanks ! |
It seems we're missing permission from @mathijshenquet |
I agree to this change, and any other future changes the rgtk team would Sorry for the late response On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 17:27 Gleb Kozyrev [email protected] wrote:
|
Thank you, @mathijshenquet, this is a relief. :) |
@mathijshenquet: it's been a while ! Hope you're doing fine. Thanks for your agreement ! |
Since everyone concerned by the change of license has given his agreement, we can close this issue. If I'm wrong, don't hesitate to notify me ! |
"infected by GPL" Right. Okay. |
For the moment, here are the contributors who agreed to the change of license:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: