Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding a Code of Conduct #468

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2016
Merged

Adding a Code of Conduct #468

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2016

Conversation

adamhjk
Copy link
Contributor

@adamhjk adamhjk commented Apr 29, 2016

This adds a code of conduct, straight from http://contributor-covenant.org/

We may adopt a different one, but with new folks joining, better to have one than not.

@thesentinels
Copy link
Contributor

By analyzing the blame information on this pull request, we identified @adamhjk to be a potential reviewer

Signed-off-by: Adam Jacob <[email protected]>
@adamhjk
Copy link
Contributor Author

adamhjk commented Apr 29, 2016

@thesentinels r+

@thesentinels
Copy link
Contributor

📌 Commit 1e61049 has been approved by adamhjk

thesentinels pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2016
Signed-off-by: Adam Jacob <[email protected]>

Pull request: #468
Approved by: adamhjk
@thesentinels
Copy link
Contributor

⌛ Testing commit 1e61049 with merge aff969b...

@thesentinels
Copy link
Contributor

☀️ Test successful - travis

@thesentinels thesentinels merged commit 1e61049 into master Apr 29, 2016
smith pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2016
Signed-off-by: Adam Jacob <[email protected]>

Pull request: #468
Approved by: adamhjk
@adamhjk adamhjk deleted the code_of_conduct branch June 10, 2016 04:19
jtimberman pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2016
Signed-off-by: Adam Jacob <[email protected]>

Pull request: #468
Approved by: adamhjk
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants