Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use with for the leader #803

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2016
Merged

Use with for the leader #803

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2016

Conversation

adamhjk
Copy link
Contributor

@adamhjk adamhjk commented Jun 13, 2016

gif-keyboard-15441619571874564483

We really did mean to use with here, not each.

Signed-off-by: Adam Jacob [email protected]

We really did mean to use with here, not each.

Signed-off-by: Adam Jacob <[email protected]>
@thesentinels
Copy link
Contributor

By analyzing the blame information on this pull request, we identified @kevindickerson, @reset and @fnichol to be potential reviewers

@juliandunn
Copy link
Contributor

@thesentinels r+

@thesentinels
Copy link
Contributor

📌 Commit 790ed37 has been approved by juliandunn

@fnichol
Copy link
Collaborator

fnichol commented Jun 14, 2016

@thesentinels r+

@thesentinels
Copy link
Contributor

💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.

@thesentinels
Copy link
Contributor

📌 Commit 790ed37 has been approved by fnichol

@thesentinels
Copy link
Contributor

⌛ Testing commit 790ed37 with merge 1bed91c...

thesentinels pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2016
We really did mean to use with here, not each.

Signed-off-by: Adam Jacob <[email protected]>

Pull request: #803
Approved by: fnichol
@thesentinels
Copy link
Contributor

☀️ Test successful - travis

@thesentinels thesentinels merged commit 790ed37 into master Jun 14, 2016
@juliandunn juliandunn deleted the redis-means-with branch June 14, 2016 00:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants