Execute additional command after -- #307
Conversation
hairyhenderson
force-pushed
the
exec-extra-args
branch
4 times, most recently
from
fb3f095 to
6d73202
Compare
| @@ -45,6 +46,29 @@ func printVersion(name string) { | |||
| fmt.Printf("%s version %s\n", name, version.Version) | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| // postRunExec - if templating succeeds, the command following a '--' will be executed | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It might be good to not "overload" the -- to only mean execution. That way it can be used in other contexts down the line.
The way chamber and aws-vault work is they have an additional argument to indicate execution.
https://github.com/segmentio/chamber#exec
https://github.com/99designs/aws-vault#usage
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤔 do you have other contexts in mind?
I had a brief look at those other tools and it seems they both have an explicit exec subcommand.
We could do that in gomplate, but I'm not sure I really see the point right yet. At this point it seems like it'd just be an extra 4 characters to type 😉
There's nothing stopping alternate usage with a subcommand later on, while still supporting this more basic syntax.
Does that make sense @osterman?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes - makes sense.
I look at it in terms of future proofing the command line interface. While today, it's adequate, it might reduce confusion in the long run. The way gomplate is implemented is not unconventional or unreasonable. =) Just have noticed that amongst the apps I use these days, a common interface has started to evolve. If you look at helm, kops, kubectl, chamber, docker, aws-valut, terraform, vault, tctl they all implement them this way. (They all happen to be in go as well)
This is quickly spiraling into a larger conversation and just so you know, I don't feel incredibly strongly about it. I just wanted to point this out, since I think it's a nice interface to copy.
In gomplate, the --version option is available. There's no disputing that this is incredibly common of course in console apps. However, the trend I'm seeing to leverage a combination of positional parameter aka subcommand with options. I guess the thinking is options modify commands. So --version doesn't modify anything. It's a command. This will make it easier as well to scope options to specific commands.
In the case of gomplate, I could envision a number of subcommands.
e.g
validate
exec
version
apply
help
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good point @osterman, and, I'm on board. Maybe at some point later on I'll add some of those. I like the idea of validate too, though not entirely certain that'd be easy to implement.
Anyway, for now we'll stick with this current naive/simplistic approach I think 😉
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This isn't a bad idea, actually.
gomplate exec ${normal_gomplate_args} -- /my/command/and/its/args
Whereas the default subcommand is gomplate render ? Then it would be clear and easy to say, "the exec subcommand requires the -- delimiter to separate gomplate arguments from the command to be executed by gomplate". If you don't specify exec or render, then you're getting the author's best guess at defaults and intentions.
Regardless, I'm excited for this.
hairyhenderson
force-pushed
the
exec-extra-args
branch
from
6d73202 to
ed66ce6
Compare
hairyhenderson
changed the title
Signed-off-by: Dave Henderson <[email protected]>
hairyhenderson
force-pushed
the
exec-extra-args
branch
from
ed66ce6 to
2fefe92
Compare
|
Thanks @hairyhenderson ! |
|
Btw, will you be cutting a new release that includes this change? Would like to download the binary. =) |
|
@osterman I will - I think 2.5.0 is long overdue, so I'll be releasing that as soon as I get some time 😉 - hopefully tonight (EDT) |
|
We're using this here: https://github.com/cloudposse/default-backend/blob/master/Dockerfile#L11 Thanks! |
|
that's awesome, @osterman - I'm glad it's useful for you! 🎉 |
Fixes #300
Signed-off-by: Dave Henderson [email protected]