Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review application metrics story #866

Closed
Nana-EC opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #887
Closed

Review application metrics story #866

Nana-EC opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #887
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request P1
Milestone

Comments

@Nana-EC
Copy link
Collaborator

Nana-EC commented Feb 1, 2023

Problem

Currently we have a good set of metrics but they can be improved and need to be reviewed for missing details

Solution

  • review current metrics and dashboards
  • determine and add additional metrics - consider server E2E, consensus calls, mirror calls
  • update dashboards to better answer activity based questions related to RPS etc

Alternatives

No response

@Nana-EC Nana-EC added enhancement New feature or request P1 labels Feb 1, 2023
@Nana-EC Nana-EC added this to the 0.18.0 milestone Feb 1, 2023
@AlfredoG87 AlfredoG87 moved this to In Progress in Smart Contract Sprint Board Feb 1, 2023
@AlfredoG87 AlfredoG87 moved this from In Progress to In Review in Smart Contract Sprint Board Feb 13, 2023
@AlfredoG87 AlfredoG87 moved this from In Review to Waiting for image in Smart Contract Sprint Board Feb 13, 2023
@AlfredoG87 AlfredoG87 moved this from Waiting for image to In Review in Smart Contract Sprint Board Feb 13, 2023
@AlfredoG87 AlfredoG87 moved this from In Review to Done in Smart Contract Sprint Board Feb 13, 2023
@Nana-EC Nana-EC closed this as completed Mar 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request P1
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants