Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: defer writing block header until first-assigned user txn time is known #17442

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tinker-michaelj
Copy link
Collaborator

@tinker-michaelj tinker-michaelj commented Jan 19, 2025

Signed-off-by: Michael Tinker <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tinker <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tinker <[email protected]>
@tinker-michaelj tinker-michaelj requested review from a team as code owners January 19, 2025 23:10
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 19, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.33333% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.91%. Comparing base (6f7e468) to head (bff0a0c).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...dera/node/app/workflows/handle/HandleWorkflow.java 33.33% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...a/node/app/blocks/impl/BlockStreamManagerImpl.java 96.55% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #17442      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     68.74%   68.91%   +0.17%     
- Complexity    22591    22671      +80     
============================================
  Files          2610     2613       +3     
  Lines         97208    97912     +704     
  Branches      10129    10160      +31     
============================================
+ Hits          66824    67479     +655     
- Misses        26567    26616      +49     
  Partials       3817     3817              
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...com/hedera/node/app/blocks/BlockStreamManager.java 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ode/app/blocks/schemas/V0560BlockStreamSchema.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...hedera/node/app/workflows/handle/HandleOutput.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...app/workflows/handle/stack/SavepointStackImpl.java 83.90% <100.00%> (+0.09%) ⬆️
...edera/node/app/workflows/ingest/IngestChecker.java 92.22% <100.00%> (+0.45%) ⬆️
.../node/app/workflows/ingest/IngestWorkflowImpl.java 82.05% <100.00%> (ø)
...ra/node/app/workflows/query/QueryWorkflowImpl.java 88.33% <100.00%> (+0.09%) ⬆️
...com/hedera/node/config/data/BlockStreamConfig.java 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...a/node/app/blocks/impl/BlockStreamManagerImpl.java 94.53% <96.55%> (+0.52%) ⬆️
...dera/node/app/workflows/handle/HandleWorkflow.java 64.04% <33.33%> (-0.08%) ⬇️

... and 89 files with indirect coverage changes

Impacted file tree graph

Copy link

codacy-production bot commented Jan 19, 2025

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.13% (target: -1.00%) 97.78%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (6f7e468) 96991 70490 72.68%
Head commit (bff0a0c) 97529 (+538) 71009 (+519) 72.81% (+0.13%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#17442) 45 44 97.78%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

Signed-off-by: Michael Tinker <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@Neeharika-Sompalli Neeharika-Sompalli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks @tinker-michaelj

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants