-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
all: Update to protocol version 5.4 and 6.4 #186
Conversation
1e941b2
to
2940589
Compare
Reference: #185 This implements protocol versions 5.4 and 6.4 in all provider server implementations, including enabling the `GetProviderSchemaOptional` server capability.
2940589
to
29beaf7
Compare
resp := &tfprotov5.PrepareProviderConfigResponse{ | ||
PreparedConfig: req.Config, // ignored by Terraform anyways | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This might be the most awkward change to the mux server implementations in this change set -- previously PrepareProviderConfig
/ValidateProviderConfig
would check if each underlying provider returned an equal PreparedConfig
response. This response field was for legacy Terraform usage (e.g. pre-0.12) where a provider could slightly change what core saw as the configuration data for a provider, such as injecting an environment variable value for a "required" provider configuration even though a value was not present in the real configuration. The only higher level provider SDK that enabled that behavior was terraform-plugin-sdk. This response field is ignored by any supported Terraform version that implements protocol versions 5 and 6 short of validating (at least currently) that it is either nil or that data value conforms to the provider schema. Therefore, while it may be safe to wholly omit the value (nil), we can instead use the framework's trick of just roundtripping the request configuration data which is guaranteed to be correct.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 🚀
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm 🚀
…data RPC and GetProviderSchemaOptional server capability (#311) Reference: #310 Protocol upgrades that impose new RPCs will either require: - The `tfprotov5.ProviderServer`/`tfprotov6.ProviderServer` interface to require a new method - Or, new "optional" interfaces be implemented (let's make up `ProviderServerWithGetMetadata` in this case) terraform-plugin-go is a low level abstraction which is designed to _directly implement_ the protocol rather than introduce its own abstractions. Most provider developers will directly interface with higher level Go modules, such as terraform-plugin-sdk and terraform-plugin-framework. Except for advanced provider development using this Go module directly, this type of low level "breaking" change will be hidden by also upgrading those Go modules at the same time: - hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk#1235 - hashicorp/terraform-plugin-framework#829 - hashicorp/terraform-plugin-mux#186 Therefore the change is implemented on the existing interface.
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions. |
Closes #185