-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor Kinesis Streams resource and data source to use keyvaluetags package #11352
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
22db3c1
Add tag listing and updating for Kinesis (streams) to keyvaluetags.
cb2683b
r/aws_kinesis_stream: Refactor tagging logic to keyvaluetags package.
a2eea21
d/aws_kinesis_stream: Refactor tagging logic to keyvaluetags package.
b39ce11
Restore call to `d.SetId()` in the Kinesis Streams Read method.
916e617
Document use of 'ServiceTagInputIdentifierRequiresSlice' customization.
0544f30
Add 'ServiceTagInputRequiresTransformation' customization and impleme…
796a9f9
r/aws_kinesis_stream: Check tag values in acceptance test.
ewbankkit 7dfbd4e
Add 'ServiceTagFunctionBatchSize'.
ewbankkit 7418bca
'TagInputRequiresTransformation' -> 'TagInputCustomValue'.
ewbankkit File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Potential optimization: Given this nice
KeyValueTags.Chunks()
implementation (💯), we might be able to skip redeclaring the majority of the copy-paste template content by re-scoping theremovedTags
andupdatedTags
variables in the loop:The template generator should automatically fix up the formatting whether it should be nested for the looping or not. This doesn't seem worth holding up this merge though. 😄
We could also support always calling
for _, removedTags := range removedTags.Chunks(-1)
for other services and forego the template conditional, but only adding the looping logic when batching is enabled seems more right.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PR submitted: #11502
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bflad Nice,
I didn't know about the formatting fix up with the template generator and had thought about something like: