Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_machine_learning_compute_cluster - subnet_resource_id does not have to be specified when node_public_ip_enabled is false #28673

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 6, 2025

Conversation

mbfrahry
Copy link
Member

@mbfrahry mbfrahry commented Feb 4, 2025

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

This PR makes it possible so that subnet_resource_id does not have to be specified when node_public_ip_enabled is false.

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

  • azurerm_machine_learning_compute_cluster - subnet_resource_id does not have to be specified when node_public_ip_enabled is false [GH-00000]

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #27506

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

…t have to be specified when node_public_ip_enabled is false
@@ -155,8 +155,10 @@ func resourceComputeCluster() *pluginsdk.Resource {
},

"subnet_resource_id": {
Type: pluginsdk.TypeString,
Type: pluginsdk.TypeString,
// O + C as you don't have to specify it for Azure to assign one to the cluster
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// O + C as you don't have to specify it for Azure to assign one to the cluster
// NOTE: O+C as you don't have to specify it for Azure to assign one to the cluster

Comment on lines -224 to -231
workspaceInManagedVnet := false

if workspaceModel.Properties != nil &&
workspaceModel.Properties.ManagedNetwork != nil &&
workspaceModel.Properties.ManagedNetwork.Status != nil &&
workspaceModel.Properties.ManagedNetwork.Status.Status != nil {
workspaceInManagedVnet = *workspaceModel.Properties.ManagedNetwork.Status.Status == workspaces.ManagedNetworkStatusActive
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you able to confirm that this check isn't still required? Do we have an acceptance test for this?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe my acceptance test covered this check not being needed because nodePublicIPEnabled was false, the subnetResourceID was not specified and the workspace was not in a managed vnet and that test passes

--- PASS: TestAccComputeCluster_subnetResourceId (670.21s)

Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @mbfrahry! One last comment regarding the docs, but once that's been updated this will be good to go!

}

if !nodePublicIPEnabled && subnetResourceID == "" && !workspaceInManagedVnet {
return fmt.Errorf("`subnet_resource_id` must be set if `node_public_ip_enabled` is set to `false` or the workspace is not in a managed network")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Last comment, the docs mention this validation for the node_public_ip_enabled property, we should remove it.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good shout and done! Thanks @stephybun

Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @mbfrahry LGTM 🦄

@stephybun stephybun merged commit 63d83f5 into main Feb 6, 2025
34 checks passed
@stephybun stephybun deleted the b-mlcc-subnet-resource-id branch February 6, 2025 15:46
stephybun added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2025
jackofallops added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2025
* CHANGELOG.md for v4.18.0

* Update CHANGELOG.md for #28308

* Update for #28447

* Update for #28532

* Update for #28537

* Update CHANGELOG.md for #28674

* Update for #28363

* Update for #28536

* Update for #28416

* Update CHANGELOG.md #28700

* Update for #28673

* Update for #28308

Co-authored-by: Wodans Son <[email protected]>

* Update for #27533

* prep for release

---------

Co-authored-by: stephybun <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: sreallymatt <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Wodans Son <[email protected]>
hqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhq pushed a commit to hqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhq/terraform-provider-azurerm that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2025
…s not have to be specified when `node_public_ip_enabled` is `false` (hashicorp#28673)

* azurerm_machine_learning_compute_cluster - subnet_resource_id does not have to be specified when node_public_ip_enabled is false

* Address review

* Fix O+C message

* address doc fix
hqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhq pushed a commit to hqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhqhq/terraform-provider-azurerm that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2025
* CHANGELOG.md for v4.18.0

* Update CHANGELOG.md for hashicorp#28308

* Update for hashicorp#28447

* Update for hashicorp#28532

* Update for hashicorp#28537

* Update CHANGELOG.md for hashicorp#28674

* Update for hashicorp#28363

* Update for hashicorp#28536

* Update for hashicorp#28416

* Update CHANGELOG.md hashicorp#28700

* Update for hashicorp#28673

* Update for hashicorp#28308

Co-authored-by: Wodans Son <[email protected]>

* Update for hashicorp#27533

* prep for release

---------

Co-authored-by: stephybun <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: sreallymatt <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Wodans Son <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
2 participants