Update npm package lit to v2.8.0

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
lit (source)	dependencies	minor	2.4.1 -> 2.8.0

---

Release Notes

lit/lit (lit)

v2.8.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

• #​3993 e2c50569 - Fix return type of isTemplateResult helper to include the CompiledTemplateResult and fix the cache directive to work correctly with CompiledTemplateResults. Also add an explicit isCompiledTemplateResult helper.

Patch Changes

• #​4031 8057c78d - Rename ReactiveElement._initialize to __initialize, make it private, and remove the @​internal annotation. This will help prevent collisions with subclasses that implement their own _initialize method, while using development builds.

• Updated dependencies [e2c50569]:

  • [email protected]

v2.7.6

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• #​3968 5bb40831 - Allow undefined to be passed to the ref() directive

• #​3969 7d8d4a15 - Make RefOrCallback generic like Ref

• #​3987 bb2560f1 - Change the h field of CompiledTemplates to a TemplateStringsArray preventing the spoofing of CompiledTemplates by JSON injection attacks. This should not be a breaking change for most users unless you're using CompiledTemplates. This is a necessary security fix, similar to #​2307.

v2.7.5

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• #​3917 f6387e35 - Allow decorators to accept ReactiveElement class from a different source.

v2.7.4

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• #​3871 308280eb - remove test directory from npm publication

v2.7.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• #​3825 343187b1 - static-html no longer adds an item to TemplateResult's value array for the last consumed static value. This fixes an error with server-side rendering of static html.

• #​3766 4431cbb8 - Fix styleMap initial render of mixed-case custom props

v2.7.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• #​3788 88fe0390 - Allow numbers to be used as values in styleMap()

v2.7.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• #​3768 7c1191da - Fix styleMap's handling of important flags

• #​3720 575fb578 - lit-html/experimental-hydrate.js and lit-element/experimental-hydrate-support.js have been moved to @lit-labs/ssr-client.

  The modules in the original location have been marked deprecated and will be removed in a future version.

v2.7.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

• #​3677 b95c86e5 - [SSR only] Reflect ARIA attributes onto server rendered Lit elements with attached internals during SSR and remove them upon hydration.

• #​3667 e00f6f52 - [SSR only] Improved how nodes with attribute/property/event/element bindings are rendered in SSR, to avoid adding comments inside of "raw text elements" like <textarea>. Fixes #​3663.

  Note: @lit-labs/ssr and lit-html must be updated together.

Patch Changes

• #​3583 88a40177 - [SSR only] Add more detail to some hydration errors

• Updated dependencies [4d698430, b95c86e5, e00f6f52, 88a40177]:

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]

v2.6.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

• #​3526 65e56655 - Disable ShadyDOM noPatch in Node dev build. This fixes the issue of throwing due to undefined window.

• #​3561 e5c254e9 - Fix built-in shimming of HTMLElement for Node build of reactive-element to respect existing HTMLElement in global

v2.6.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

• #​3522 72fcf0d7 - When running in Node, Lit now automatically includes minimal DOM shims which are
  sufficient for most SSR (Server Side Rendering) use-cases, removing the need to
  import the global DOM shim from @lit-labs/ssr.

  The new @lit-labs/ssr-dom-shim package has been introduced, which exports an HTMLElement, CustomElementRegistry, and default customElements singleton.

  The existing @lit-labs/ssr global DOM shim can still be used, and is compatible with the new package, because @lit-labs/ssr imports from @lit-labs/ssr-dom-shim. Importing the global DOM shim adds more APIs to the global object, such as a global HTMLElement, TreeWalker, fetch, and other APIs. It is recommended that users try to remove usage of the @lit-labs/ssr DOM shim, and instead rely on the more minimal, automatic shimming that @lit/reactive-element now provides automatically.

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies [72fcf0d7]:
  • @​lit/reactive-element@​1.6.0
  • [email protected]

v2.5.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

• #​3507 b152db29 - lit-html and reactive-element now include development Node builds with unminified code and dev warnings.

Patch Changes

• Updated dependencies [b152db29]:
  • [email protected]
  • @​lit/reactive-element@​1.5.0

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/graph-benches – Integrations

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 123 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.331 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$268 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.47 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-82.656 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.822 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$72.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 462 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.878 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$24.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.352 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.308 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.54 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.141 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$2.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.52 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.076 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.99 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.933 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.86 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.521 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-22.333 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.76 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.256 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$12.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 131 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.605 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$1.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.14 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.542 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 214 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 203 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.251 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 212 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.253 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 212 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 208 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-31.909 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.731 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$98.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 541 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.079 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$78.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 473 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.156 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$41.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 399 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$89.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 536 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.697 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$93.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 475 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.124 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 620 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.371 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$58.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 377 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.341 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$43.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 310 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.214 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$39.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.062 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$49.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 282 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.156 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$53.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 332 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.091 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$66.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 380 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.499 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph