Update temporalio-ts monorepo to v1.11.7

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
@temporalio/activity (source)	dependencies	patch	1.11.6 -> 1.11.7
@temporalio/client (source)	dependencies	patch	1.11.6 -> 1.11.7
@temporalio/common (source)	dependencies	patch	1.11.6 -> 1.11.7
@temporalio/proto (source)	dependencies	patch	1.11.6 -> 1.11.7
@temporalio/worker (source)	dependencies	patch	1.11.6 -> 1.11.7
@temporalio/workflow (source)	devDependencies	patch	1.11.6 -> 1.11.7
@temporalio/workflow (source)	dependencies	patch	1.11.6 -> 1.11.7

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

temporalio/sdk-typescript (@​temporalio/activity)

v1.11.7: 1.11.7

Compare Source

[1.11.7] - 2025-01-30

Bug Fixes

• [worker] Avoid crash on Bun due to stub promiseHooks

Security

• Update multiple NPM and Rust dependencies

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 21.03%. Comparing base (70aa0bb) to head (02f882e).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6308      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   21.21%   21.03%   -0.18%     
==========================================
  Files         573      580       +7     
  Lines       19664    19831     +167     
  Branches     2872     2929      +57     
==========================================
  Hits         4171     4171              
- Misses      15441    15608     +167     
  Partials       52       52              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.34% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️
apps.hash-api	1.14% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.91% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.221 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$2.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.55 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.108 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$2.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.036 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.595 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 177 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-26.549 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-30.536 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 185 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.054 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 171 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.632 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 163 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.283 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 209 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.550 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.075 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.817 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$2.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.72 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.293 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$87.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 376 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.162 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$82.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 425 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.929 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$73.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 335 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.571 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$90.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 392 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.559 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$99.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 529 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.257 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$38.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 212 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.259 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$53.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 335 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$48.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 247 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.782 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$42.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 130 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.697 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$56.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$65.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 356 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.348 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$38.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.079 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$177 \mathrm{ms} \pm 560 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.511 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$21.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 95.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.407 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$27.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.958 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$57.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 200 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.502 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.36 \mathrm{s} \pm 537 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}1872 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.29 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.108 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.635 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$2.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.40 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.552 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.40 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.126 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph