Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

would it increase takeup if there were a docker image with everything preinstalled? #344

Closed
chumbleycode opened this issue Aug 21, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

would it increase takeup if there were a docker image with everything preinstalled? #344

chumbleycode opened this issue Aug 21, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels
CI Continuous integration old_type: distribution status: blocked Not actionable, because blocked by upstream/GHC etc. type: enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@chumbleycode
Copy link

as with rocker for R?
@jneira jneira added CI Continuous integration type: support User support tickets, questions, help with setup etc. labels Aug 24, 2020
pepeiborra pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 27, 2020
@serras @cocreature
Enhancements to Haddock -> Markdown conversion (#344)
956e11d 
* Enhancements to Haddock -> Markdown conversion

* Add tests for Haddock -> Markdown conversion

* Make HLint happy

* Let Haddock tests compile also in 8.4

* Fix build for 8.4

* Fix test for haddock-library 1.8.0

* Fix CPP problem

* Make tests a bit more readable

Co-authored-by: Moritz Kiefer <[email protected]>
@jneira jneira changed the title would it increase takeup if there were a docker image with eveything preinstalled? would it increase takeup if there were a docker image with everything preinstalled? Jun 12, 2021
@jneira
Copy link
Member

jneira commented Jun 12, 2021

Hi, i think this was somewhat a proposal about setup a docker image with hls and all tools needed to start hacking with haskell code. That could be a nice way to distribute indeed.

@jneira
Copy link
Member

jneira commented Jun 12, 2021

And we could use it for setup a vscode dev container.
In fact from a quick search i found a image: https://github.com/vzarytovskii/haskell-dev-env
Maybe we should mention it in docs?

@jneira jneira added type: documentation and removed type: support User support tickets, questions, help with setup etc. labels Jun 12, 2021
@ndmitchell
Copy link
Collaborator

Should this be the IDE team, or perhaps this could be a Haskell foundation project, where they bundle HLS, plus whatever else. For example, I think such a package should almost certainly contain Alex/Happy, but us bundling them, and figuring out which version etc, seems like an orthogonal problem.

@jneira
Copy link
Member

jneira commented Jun 13, 2021

Agree, ideally it should be integrated in https://hub.docker.com/_/haskell via https://github.com/haskell/docker-haskell/issues

@jneira jneira mentioned this issue Jun 14, 2021
Closed
@jneira
Copy link
Member

jneira commented Jun 14, 2021

Opened issue upstream: haskell/docker-haskell#41

@jneira jneira added the status: blocked Not actionable, because blocked by upstream/GHC etc. label Jun 14, 2021
@jneira
Copy link
Member

jneira commented Sep 27, 2021

Although the upstream issue is still open we get a container matching the requirement of the issue directly hosted in microsoft vscode dev containers: https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-dev-containers/tree/main/containers/haskell
So i am gonna close this, @chumbleycode feel free to reopen if you think the mentioned image does not fullfill your requirements

@jneira jneira closed this as completed Sep 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
CI Continuous integration old_type: distribution status: blocked Not actionable, because blocked by upstream/GHC etc. type: enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@jneira @ndmitchell @chumbleycode