-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 369
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make adding missing constraint work in presence of 'forall' (fixes #1164) #1177
Make adding missing constraint work in presence of 'forall' (fixes #1164) #1177
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good catch, thanks!
b65b289
to
c3edf32
Compare
Given my reply above @pepeiborra I hope you don't mind reverting your change. |
Alright, I changed in the most obvious way by not reusing code action names for test description, instead adding separate description for each test. |
@@ -283,3 +283,12 @@ pattern ExposePackage s a mr <- DynFlags.ExposePackage s a _ mr | |||
#else | |||
pattern ExposePackage s a mr = DynFlags.ExposePackage s a mr | |||
#endif | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like splitLHsForAllTy
no longer exists since ghc 8.10 and there's now just splitLHsForAllTyInvis.
Is this way of handling this situation ok?
Fixes #1164