Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Draft] Make JIT completely equivalent to VM (Forward Mode) #16

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Aug 17, 2024

Conversation

hikettei
Copy link
Owner

@hikettei hikettei commented Aug 16, 2024

  • Support the graph whose outputs are scalar (use scalar pointers)
  • BugFix: (!view xxx `(-1 1 -1)) in JIT (fix render-isl-aref)
  • Fix: Index-Component for column major
  • Fix: val_xxx is undeclared
    • Solved for forward mode
    • Solved for the backward mode (needs some refactor)
      • Enumerate all save-for-backward existing in the graph before start compilation
      • Move on another PR
  • (fconst 'a) should be inferred to :float, not :uint32_t
  • Improve memory-planner to fuse/remove extra allocation (as well as the backward mode!)
  • Refactor the renderer; To render an instruction, we only need either of %render-expr or %render-node. (REMOVE MULTIEXPR=1)
  • Fix segv; make ISL gc-reachable
  • all unittest for recently added computations
    (After this PR merged, let's start working on OpenCL/METAL Backends or improving the polyhedral compiler to support OMP, vectorization, 4x4 accumulation for gemm, etc)

@hikettei hikettei changed the title [Draft] Making JIT competely working as the VM [Draft] Make JIT equivalent to VM Aug 16, 2024
@hikettei hikettei changed the title [Draft] Make JIT equivalent to VM [Draft] Make JIT completely equivalent to VM Aug 16, 2024
@hikettei hikettei marked this pull request as ready for review August 17, 2024 02:38
@hikettei hikettei changed the title [Draft] Make JIT completely equivalent to VM [Draft] Make JIT completely equivalent to VM (Forward Mode) Aug 17, 2024
@hikettei hikettei merged commit 85f6f32 into main Aug 17, 2024
1 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant