Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Results analysis #103

Merged
merged 48 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024
Merged

feat: Results analysis #103

merged 48 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024

Conversation

ThetaSinner
Copy link
Member

@ThetaSinner ThetaSinner commented Sep 30, 2024

I believe this is ready to go as a first draft. I do think that some of the way I'm expecting runIds to be consistent across nodes and that we can know information about how many agents participated and ended from one node is specific to Local/TryCP. This will need adjusting if we go to a distributed run approach. However, I believe that the data analysis is reasonable in a distributed case because that shouldn't be assuming anything about how the scenario was run.

Whether the metrics are exactly what we need is a question for when we start asking questions based on them. But we can get some basic insights and track performance over time with this.

This will still need integrating with the performance test pipeline. That's not straight forward enough that I think it should happen on this PR.

@ThetaSinner ThetaSinner marked this pull request as draft September 30, 2024 19:40
@ThetaSinner ThetaSinner force-pushed the feat/wind-tunnel-results-analysis branch from 9365e09 to 574cd4e Compare September 30, 2024 19:42
@ThetaSinner ThetaSinner force-pushed the feat/wind-tunnel-results-analysis branch from 625101c to bd95ac8 Compare October 21, 2024 19:02
@ThetaSinner ThetaSinner marked this pull request as ready for review October 21, 2024 19:35
Copy link
Contributor

@cdunster cdunster left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good, I think the main thing is about the 10e6 🙂

framework/summary_model/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
framework/summary_model/src/lib.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
framework/summary_model/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
framework/summary_model/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
scenarios/dht_sync_lag/src/main.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
scenarios/two_party_countersigning/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
summariser/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
summariser/src/analyze.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
summariser/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
summariser/src/query.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
jost-s
jost-s previously approved these changes Oct 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@jost-s jost-s left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, whoo

summariser/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
summariser/src/analyze.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
jost-s
jost-s previously approved these changes Oct 23, 2024
@ThetaSinner
Copy link
Member Author

Turns out there was a problem with the data data. I hadn't included the scenario name in the fingerprint so scenarios with the same settings were getting the same fingerprint... Which isn't right! So I've sorted that now and added some tests/checks to stop things like that happening again

@ThetaSinner ThetaSinner force-pushed the feat/wind-tunnel-results-analysis branch from c339bdd to 884cf54 Compare October 23, 2024 20:08
neonphog
neonphog previously approved these changes Oct 23, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@neonphog neonphog left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice 👍

cdunster
cdunster previously approved these changes Oct 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@cdunster cdunster left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some minor suggestions but LGTM.

framework/summary_model/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
framework/summary_model/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
summariser/src/main.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cdunster
cdunster previously approved these changes Oct 25, 2024
@ThetaSinner ThetaSinner force-pushed the feat/wind-tunnel-results-analysis branch from dc84124 to 78d023f Compare October 25, 2024 12:45
@ThetaSinner ThetaSinner enabled auto-merge October 25, 2024 14:04
@ThetaSinner ThetaSinner disabled auto-merge October 25, 2024 15:39
@ThetaSinner ThetaSinner enabled auto-merge October 25, 2024 15:39
@ThetaSinner ThetaSinner added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 25, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit a9d342f Oct 25, 2024
2 checks passed
@ThetaSinner ThetaSinner deleted the feat/wind-tunnel-results-analysis branch October 25, 2024 16:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants